Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38261100›Full record

ArticleJournal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing2024

Treatment of atrial fibrillation with second-generation cryoballoon followed by contact-sensing radiofrequency catheter ablation for arrhythmia recurrences-results of a 5-year follow-up.

Andrija Nekić, Ivan Prepolec, Vedran Pašara, Jakov Emanuel Bogdanić, Jurica Putrić Posavec, Domagoj Kardum, Zvonimir Katić, Andrija Štajduhar, Borka Pezo Nikolić, Davor Puljević and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Andrija NekićSchool of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Šalata 3, Zagreb, Croatia.
Ivan PrepolecDepartment of Cardiovascular Diseases, University Hospital Center Zagreb, Kišpatićeva 12, 10000, Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5870-202X
Vedran PašaraDepartment of Cardiovascular Diseases, University Hospital Center Zagreb, Kišpatićeva 12, 10000, Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6587-2315
Jakov Emanuel BogdanićSchool of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Šalata 3, Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6656-8289
Jurica Putrić PosavecSchool of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Šalata 3, Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1667-802X
Domagoj KardumDepartment of Cardiovascular Diseases, University Hospital Center Zagreb, Kišpatićeva 12, 10000, Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5202-4061
Zvonimir KatićDepartment of Cardiovascular Diseases, University Hospital Center Zagreb, Kišpatićeva 12, 10000, Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0493-3188
Andrija ŠtajduharSchool of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Šalata 3, Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2523-1257
Borka Pezo NikolićDepartment of Cardiovascular Diseases, University Hospital Center Zagreb, Kišpatićeva 12, 10000, Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0504-5238
Davor PuljevićDepartment of Cardiovascular Diseases, University Hospital Center Zagreb, Kišpatićeva 12, 10000, Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3603-2242
Davor MiličićSchool of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Šalata 3, Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9101-1570
G B ChierchiaHeart Rhythm Management Center, UZ Brussel-VUB, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2967-1345
Carlo de AsmundisHeart Rhythm Management Center, UZ Brussel-VUB, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9351-0760
Vedran VelagićSchool of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Šalata 3, Zagreb, Croatia. vvelagic@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5425-5840
University Hospital Centre Zagreb · HRUniversity of Zagreb · HRUniversitair Ziekenhuis Brussel · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe aim of this study was to report the long-term follow-up results of cryoballoon (CB) ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation.

methodsAll consecutive patients who underwent second-generation CB ablation from February 2015 to December 2017 were included in our study. In all procedures, we used a 28-mm CB placed via a single transseptal puncture guided by intracardiac ultrasound. A 20-mm octapolar intraluminal circular catheter was used for intracardiac recordings. A single 180-s freeze strategy was employed. Repeated procedures were performed with a 3D mapping system and radiofrequency catheters.

resultsA total of 126 patients (69.8% male, mean age 57 ± 11 years), of which 77.0% had paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF), were included in the study. After a 5-year period, 52.4% of patients were in sinus rhythm without AF recurrence, off antiarrhythmic drugs. A total of 61.9% of patients were free of AF recurrence when redo PVI procedures were performed. When accounting for redo pulmonary vein isolation and antiarrhythmic drugs, a total of 73.8% of the patients were without AF recurrence in long-term follow-up. The patients who underwent redo pulmonary vein isolation procedures had statistically significant lower rates of AF recurrence (p = 0.006). In patients with PAF, long-term success rates improved from 62.9 to 79.4% for patients who underwent the redo procedure (p = 0.020). In patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (PersAF), success rates went up from 41.4 to 55.1% for patients with single or repeated PVI procedure (p = 0.071). In the whole cohort, a total of 3 (2.4%) procedure-related major complications occurred which included persistent PNP, arterial pseudoaneurysm, and arteriovenous fistula.

conclusionOur data suggest a favorable long-term safety and efficacy profile of second-generation CB ablation. In the mixed paroxysmal and persistent population, up to 73.8% of patients remained free of AF recurrence in the 5-year follow-up, when accounting for redo procedures and AADs. Only 2.4% of patients experienced major complications of the ablation procedure, none with permanent sequelae.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationCatheter AblationCryosurgeryRecurrenceAgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPulmonary VeinsReoperationRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAtrial fibrillationCatheter ablationCryoballoonLong-term follow-up

Identifiers

PMID38261100
OpenAlexW4391145023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.