ArticleApplied microbiology and biotechnology2024
Bacterial adhesion inhibition by microalgal EPSs from Cylindrotheca closterium and Tetraselmis suecica biofilms.
Article in Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Complementary functionalities of extracellular polymeric substances, adhesion ability and hydrophobicity in Pseudomonas isolates may help the selection of strategically advantageous microbial inoculants.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2026Article
- Arctic Diatoms as a Source of Antibiofilm Compounds: Identification of Methyl 3-Hydroxyoctadecanoate and PheophorbideBiomolecules · 2025Article
- DisarmingPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the food industry, successful bacterial pathogen colonization and persistence begin with their adhesion to a surface, followed by the spatial development of mature biofilm of public health concerns. Compromising bacterial settlement with natural inhibitors is a promising alternative to conventional anti-fouling treatments typically based on chemical biocides that contribute to the growing burden of antimicrobial resistance. In this study, three extracellular polymeric substance (EPS) fractions extracted from microalgae biofilms of Cylindrotheca closterium (fraction C) and Tetraselmis suecica (fraction Ta rich in insoluble scale structure and fraction Tb rich in soluble EPS) were screened for their anti-adhesive properties, against eight human food-borne pathogens belonging to Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica, and Listeria monocytogenes species. The results showed that the fraction Ta was the most effective inducing statistically significant reduction for three strains of E. coli, S. aureus, and L. monocytogenes. Overall, EPSs coating on polystyrene surfaces of the different fractions increased the hydrophilic character of the support. Differences in bacterial adhesion on the different coated surfaces could be explained by several dissimilarities in the structural and physicochemical EPS compositions, according to HPLC and ATR-FTIR analysis. Interestingly, while fractions Ta and Tb were extracted from the same microalgal culture, distinct adhesion patterns were observed, highlighting the importance of the extraction process. Overall, the findings showed that EPS extracted from microalgal photosynthetic biofilms can exhibit anti-adhesive effects against food-borne pathogens and could help develop sustainable and non-toxic anti-adhesive surfaces for the food industry. KEY POINTS: •EPSs from a biofilm-based culture of C. closterium/T. suecica were characterized. •Microalgal EPS extracted from T. suecica biofilms showed bacterial anti-adhesive effects. •The anti-adhesive effect is strain-specific and affects both Gram - and Gram + bacteria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.