SynthesisEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2024
Diagnostic performance of sonography in penetrating torso trauma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Transport and destination hospital for patients with suspected multiple and/or severe injuries - a systematic review and clinical practice guideline update.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026Pooled it
- Selective Nonoperative Management of Abdominal Stab Wounds in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.World journal of surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Be consistent. Be thorough. Be consistently thorough.Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center) · 2026Article
- Firearm injury to the left buttock with uterus penetrating trauma.Radiology case reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis systematic review investigates the diagnostic value of ultrasound in the evaluation of torso injuries following a penetrating trauma.
methodsWe searched PubMed, Scopus, and WOS databases for related original articles until May 7, 2023, and extracted data related to diagnostic performance. The bivariate model and hierarchic summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) approach were used to calculate pooled diagnostic values. Cochrane Q test and I-squared were performed to evaluate heterogeneity. We assessed heterogeneity with meta-regression.
resultsSeventeen studies were included, which involved a total number of 1866 patients. According to meta-analysis, sonography demonstrated a pooled sensitivity of 56% (45-67%) and specificity of 96% (94-97%), positive likelihood ratio (LR +) of 13.66 (8.03-23.23), and negative likelihood ratio (LR-) of 0.45 (0.35-0.59) for detecting abdominal injuries. In pericardial penetrating trauma, pooled sensitivity was 100% (45-100%), pooled specificity was 99% (96-100%), LR + was 136.7 (24.8-752.3), and LR- was 0.00 (0.00-1.22). For thoracic penetrating trauma, pooled sensitivity was 99% (93-100%) and specificity was 100% (98-100%).
conclusionsSonography demonstrated promising diagnostic value in the initial assessment of torso penetrating trauma, particularly in the thoracic and pericardial regions. However, the sensitivity of sonography is limited in abdominal penetrating trauma and a combination with other imaging modalities should be considered in these cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.