ArticleJAMA2024
Anxiety and Depression Symptoms After the Dobbs Abortion Decision.
Article in JAMA, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed.
- Restrictive abortion policy climate is associated with increased depression symptoms among women in the United States: Findings from a 25-year longitudinal study.SSM. Mental health · 2026Article
- The Texas Abortion Ban and Maternal Mental Health.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Adolescent Suicidality After State-Level Total Abortion Bans.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Associations between state-level abortion restrictions and postpartum depression symptoms from a United States nationwide cohort.Lancet regional health. Americas · 2026Article
- Socioeconomic Status and Postpartum Depression Risk After the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization Decision, Based on State Trigger Laws.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Mental health and beliefs about abortion access following changes to reproductive healthcare laws in 2022: findings from Oklahoma.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Report: Workshop on maternal mental health, February 11-12, 2024, cosponsored by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.Pregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025Article
- Mapping Mental Health Across US States: the Role of Economic and Social Support Policies.The Milbank quarterly · 2025Article
- Insurance coverage and employment after Medicaid expansion with work requirements: quasi-experimental difference-in-differences study.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2025Article
- Suicide deaths among reproductive-aged women in the US post-Dobbs: a national time-series analysis.Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2025Article
- Clinical Psychology in the Post-Dobbs Era: Navigating Clinical Practice, Research, and Advocacy in a Changing Sexual- and Reproductive-Health Landscape.Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2025Article
- Women's reproductive mental health: currently available evidence and future directions for research, clinical practice and health policy.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2025Article
- Politics and development as drivers of women's reproductive mental health.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2025Article
- Association Between State Abortion Restrictiveness and Perinatal Depression.Journal of women's health (2002) · 2025Article
- US State Policies and Mental Health Symptoms Among Sexual and Gender Minority Adults.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Mental Distress Among Females Following 2021 Abortion Restrictions in Texas.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Association between abortion restrictiveness and suicidality among birthing people in the United States 2010 to 2020.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2025Article
- Abortion and Mental Health and Wellbeing: A Contemporary Review of the Literature.Current psychiatry reports · 2024Review
- State COVID-19 Vaccine Mandates and Uptake Among Health Care Workers in the US.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- The impact of abortion restrictions on American mental health.Science advances · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: In 2022, the US Supreme Court abolished the federal right to abortion in the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization decision. In 13 states, abortions were immediately banned via previously passed legislation, known as trigger laws. Objective: To estimate changes in anxiety and depression symptoms following the Dobbs decision among people residing in states with trigger laws compared with those without them. Design, Setting, and Participants: Using the nationally representative repeated cross-sectional Household Pulse Survey (December 2021-January 2023), difference-in-differences models were estimated to examine the change in symptoms of depression and anxiety after Dobbs (either the June 24, 2022, Dobbs decision, or its May 2, 2022, leaked draft benchmarked to the baseline period, prior to May 2, 2022) by comparing the 13 trigger states with the 37 nontrigger states. Models were estimated for the full population (N = 718 753), and separately for 153 108 females and 102 581 males aged 18 through 45 years. Exposure: Residing in states with trigger laws following the Dobbs decision or its leaked draft. Main Outcomes and Measures: Anxiety and depression symptoms were measured via the Patient Health Questionnaire-4 ([PHQ-4]; range, 0-12; scores of more than 5 indicate elevated depression or anxiety symptoms; minimal important difference unknown). Results: The survey response rate was 6.04% overall, and 87% of respondents completed the PHQ-4. The population-weighted mean age was 48 years (SD, 17 years), and 51% were female. In trigger states, the mean PHQ-4 scores in the baseline period and after the Dobbs decision were 3.51 (95% CI, 3.44 to 3.59) and 3.81 (95% CI, 3.75 to 3.87), respectively, and in nontrigger states were 3.31 (95% CI, 3.27 to 3.34) and 3.49 (95% CI, 3.45 to 3.53), respectively. There was a significantly greater increase in the mean PHQ-4 score by 0.11 (95% CI, 0.06 to 0.16; P < .001) in trigger states vs nontrigger states. From baseline to after the draft was leaked, the change in PHQ-4 was not significantly different for those in trigger states vs nontrigger states (difference-in-differences estimate, 0.09; 95% CI, -0.03 to 0.21; P = .15). From baseline to after the Dobbs opinion, there was a significantly greater increase in mean PHQ-4 scores for those in trigger states vs nontrigger states among females aged 18 through 45 years (difference-in-differences estimate, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.08 to 0.37; P = .002). Among males aged 18 through 45 years, the difference-in-differences estimate was not statistically significant (0.14; 95% CI, -0.08 to 0.36; P = .23). Differences in estimates for males and females aged 18 through 45 were statistically significant (P = .02). Conclusions and Relevance: In this study of US survey data from December 2021 to January 2023, residence in states with abortion trigger laws compared with residence in states without such laws was associated with a small but significantly greater increase in anxiety and depression symptoms after the Dobbs decision.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.