Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38261028›Full record

ArticleTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik2024

Translocations and inversions: major chromosomal rearrangements during Vigna (Leguminosae) evolution.

Sibelle Dias, Fernanda de Oliveira Bustamante, Lívia do Vale Martins, Victor Alves da Costa, Claudio Montenegro, Ana Rafaela da Silva Oliveira, Geyse Santos de Lima, Guilherme Tomaz Braz, Jiming Jiang, Antônio Félix da Costa and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Chromosome painting in plants: history and future perspectives.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Sibelle Dias *Departamento de Genética, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1677-6677
Fernanda de Oliveira Bustamante *Departamento de Genética, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2826-5217
Lívia do Vale MartinsDepartamento de Genética, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4645-9055
Victor Alves da CostaDepartamento de Genética, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5491-9739
Claudio MontenegroDepartamento de Botânica, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2089-1608
Ana Rafaela da Silva OliveiraDepartamento de Genética, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4815-0185
Geyse Santos de LimaDepartamento de Genética, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8208-5578
Guilherme Tomaz BrazDepartamento de Biologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0803-7778
Jiming JiangDepartment of Plant Biology, Department of Horticulture, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6435-6140
Antônio Félix da CostaInstituto Agronômico de Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9866-3504
Ana Maria Benko-IsepponDepartamento de Genética, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0575-3197
Ana Christina Brasileiro-VidalDepartamento de Genética, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil. ana.vidal@ufpe.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9704-5509

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 313527/2017-2Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 313944/2020-2Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 421968/2018-4Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 433931/2018-3Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 442019/2019-0Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 88881.189152/2018-01Fundação de Amparo à Ciência e Tecnologia do Estado de Pernambuco APQ-0390-2.02/19
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

key messageInversions and translocations are the major chromosomal rearrangements involved in Vigna subgenera evolution, being Vigna vexillata the most divergent species. Centromeric repositioning seems to be frequent within the genus. Oligonucleotide-based fluorescence in situ hybridization (Oligo-FISH) provides a powerful chromosome identification system for inferring plant chromosomal evolution. Aiming to understand macrosynteny, chromosomal diversity, and the evolution of bean species from five Vigna subgenera, we constructed cytogenetic maps for eight taxa using oligo-FISH-based chromosome identification. We used oligopainting probes from chromosomes 2 and 3 of Phaseolus vulgaris L. and two barcode probes designed from V. unguiculata (L.) Walp. genome. Additionally, we analyzed genomic blocks among the Ancestral Phaseoleae Karyotype (APK), two V. unguiculata subspecies (V. subg. Vigna), and V. angularis (Willd.) Ohwi & Ohashi (V. subg. Ceratotropis). We observed macrosynteny for chromosomes 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 in all investigated taxa except for V. vexillata (L.) A. Rich (V. subg. Plectrotropis), in which only chromosomes 4, 7, and 9 were unambiguously identified. Collinearity breaks involved with chromosomes 2 and 3 were revealed. We identified minor differences in the painting pattern among the subgenera, in addition to multiple intra- and interblock inversions and intrachromosomal translocations. Other rearrangements included a pericentric inversion in chromosome 4 (V. subg. Vigna), a reciprocal translocation between chromosomes 1 and 5 (V. subg. Ceratotropis), a potential deletion in chromosome 11 of V. radiata (L.) Wilczek, as well as multiple intrablock inversions and centromere repositioning via genomic blocks. Our study allowed the visualization of karyotypic patterns in each subgenus, revealing important information for understanding intrageneric karyotypic evolution, and suggesting V. vexillata as the most karyotypically divergent species.

Indexed as

PhaseolusVignaGene RearrangementIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceTranslocation, Genetic

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.