Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38261026›Full record

ArticleClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2025

Renal function and periprocedural complications in patients undergoing left atrial catheter ablation: A comparison between uninterrupted direct oral anticoagulants and phenprocoumon administration.

Nico Erhard, Fabian Bahlke, Lovis Spitzauer, Florian Englert, Miruna Popa, Felix Bourier, Tilko Reents, Carsten Lennerz, Hannah Kraft, Susanne Maurer and 8 more

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nico Erhard *Department of Electrophysiology, German Heart Center Munich, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Fabian Bahlke *Department of Electrophysiology, German Heart Center Munich, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Lovis SpitzauerDepartment of Electrophysiology, German Heart Center Munich, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Florian EnglertDepartment of Electrophysiology, German Heart Center Munich, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Miruna PopaDepartment of Electrophysiology, German Heart Center Munich, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Felix BourierDepartment of Electrophysiology, German Heart Center Munich, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Tilko ReentsDepartment of Electrophysiology, German Heart Center Munich, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Carsten LennerzDepartment of Electrophysiology, German Heart Center Munich, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Hannah KraftDepartment of Electrophysiology, German Heart Center Munich, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Susanne MaurerDepartment of Electrophysiology, German Heart Center Munich, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Alexander Tunsch-MartinezDepartment of Electrophysiology, German Heart Center Munich, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Jan SyväriDepartment of Electrophysiology, German Heart Center Munich, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Madeleine TydecksDepartment of Electrophysiology, German Heart Center Munich, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Marta TelishevskaDepartment of Electrophysiology, German Heart Center Munich, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Sarah LengauerDepartment of Electrophysiology, German Heart Center Munich, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Gabrielle HesslingDepartment of Electrophysiology, German Heart Center Munich, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Isabel DeisenhoferDepartment of Electrophysiology, German Heart Center Munich, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Marc KottmaierDepartment of Electrophysiology, German Heart Center Munich, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany. mkottmaier@web.de.
Technical University of Munich · DEDeutsches Herzzentrum München · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundData regarding uninterrupted oral anticoagulation in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) during catheter ablation for left atrial arrhythmias is limited. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of periprocedural uninterrupted direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) compared with uninterrupted phenprocoumon in patients with CKD undergoing left atrial catheter ablation. METHODS AND

resultsWe conducted a retrospective single-center study of patients who underwent left atrial catheter ablation between 2016 and 2019 with underlying chronic kidney disease (glomerular filtration rate (GFR) between 15 and 45 ml/min). The primary objective of this study was to investigate whether direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) therapy or warfarin presents a superior safety profile in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) undergoing left atrial catheter ablation. We compared periprocedural complications (arteriovenous fistula, aneurysm, significant hematoma (> 5 cm)) and/or bleeding (drop in hemoglobin of >2 g/dl, pericardial effusion, retroperitoneal bleeding, other bleeding, stroke) between patients receiving either uninterrupted DOAC or warfarin therapy. Secondary analysis included patient baseline characteristics as well as procedural data. A total of 188 patients (female n = 108 (57%), mean age 75.3 ± 8.1 years, mean GFR 36.8 ± 6 ml/min) were included in this study. Underlying arrhythmias were atrial fibrillation (n = 104, 55.3%) and atypical atrial flutter (n = 84, 44.7%). Of these, n = 132 patients (70%) were under a DOAC medication, and n = 56 (30%) were under phenprocoumon. Major groin complications including pseudoaneurysm and/or AV fistula occurred in 8.9% of patients in the phenprocoumon group vs. 11.3% of patients in the DOAC group, which was not statistically significant (p = 0.62). Incidence of cardiac tamponade (2.3% vs. 0%; p = 0.55) and stroke (0% vs. 0%) were low in both DOAC and phenprocoumon groups with similar post-procedural drops in hemoglobin levels (1.1±1 g/dl vs 1.1±0.9 g/dl; p = 0.71).

conclusionThe type of anticoagulation had no significant influence on bleeding or thromboembolic events as well as groin complications in this retrospective study. Despite observing an increased rate of groin complications, the uninterrupted use of DOAC or phenprocoumon during left atrial catheter ablation in patients with CKD appears to be feasible and effective.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationCatheter AblationGlomerular Filtration RatePhenprocoumonPostoperative ComplicationsRenal Insufficiency, ChronicAdministration, OralAgedAnticoagulantsFactor Xa InhibitorsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAnticoagulantsFactor Xa InhibitorsPhenprocoumonWarfarinAtrial fibrillationCatheter ablationChronic kidney diseaseOral anticoagulation

Identifiers

PMID38261026
OpenAlexW4391132485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.