Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38261004›Full record

ArticleBiological cybernetics2024

Fluctuation-response relations for integrate-and-fire models with an absolute refractory period.

Friedrich Puttkammer, Benjamin Lindner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biological cybernetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Friedrich PuttkammerBernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience Berlin, Philippstr. 13, Haus 2, 10115, Berlin, Germany.
Benjamin LindnerBernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience Berlin, Philippstr. 13, Haus 2, 10115, Berlin, Germany. benjamin.lindner@physik.hu-berlin.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We study the problem of relating the spontaneous fluctuations of a stochastic integrate-and-fire (IF) model to the response of the instantaneous firing rate to time-dependent stimulation if the IF model is endowed with a non-vanishing refractory period and a finite (stereotypical) spike shape. This seemingly harmless addition to the model is shown to complicate the analysis put forward by Lindner Phys. Rev. Lett. (2022), i.e., the incorporation of the reset into the model equation, the Rice-like averaging of the stochastic differential equation, and the application of the Furutsu-Novikov theorem. We derive a still exact (although more complicated) fluctuation-response relation (FRR) for an IF model with refractory state and a white Gaussian background noise. We also briefly discuss an approximation for the case of a colored Gaussian noise and conclude with a summary and outlook on open problems.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalStochastic ProcessesAction PotentialsAnimalsHumansNeuronsRefractory Period, ElectrophysiologicalFluctuation–dissipation relationsNeural signal transmissionSpike-train analysisStochastic neuron models

Identifiers

PMID38261004
PMCPMC11068698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.