Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38260907›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2023

An investigation of the presence and antimicrobial susceptibility of

Genever Morgan, Gina Pinchbeck, Eda Taymaz, Marie Anne Chattaway, Vanessa Schmidt, Nicola Williams

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026
    Article
  3. Poultry-associated nitrofurantoin-resistant and pre-resistantOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Genever MorganInstitute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Neston, United Kingdom.
Gina PinchbeckInstitute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Neston, United Kingdom.
Eda TaymazInstitute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Neston, United Kingdom.
Marie Anne ChattawayGastrointestinal Bacteria Reference Unit, United Kingdom Health Security Agency, London, United Kingdom.
Vanessa SchmidtInstitute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Neston, United Kingdom.
Nicola WilliamsInstitute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Neston, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Raw meat diets (RMD) for dogs are an increasingly popular alternative pet food choice, however studies worldwide have demonstrated them to be contaminated with zoonotic and antimicrobial resistant (AMR) bacteria, including bacteria resistant to critically important antibiotics. Despite this, few data exist surrounding the presence of these bacteria in RMD in the United Kingdom. The present study aimed to identify the most commonly selected RMD and non-raw diets (NRMD) by United Kingdom dog owners. Additionally, it investigated the presence of AMR-

Indexed as

antimicrobial resistancedogE. coliEnterobacteriaceaefoodpetraw

Identifiers

PMID38260907
PMCPMC10800874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.