Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38260861›Full record

ArticleData in brief2024

A novel dataset of date fruit for inspection and classification.

Abdul Khalique Maitlo, Riaz Ahmed Shaikh, Rafaqat Hussain Arain

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Data in brief, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Abdul Khalique MaitloInstitute of Computer Science, Shah Abdul Latif University Khairpur, Pakistan.
Riaz Ahmed ShaikhInstitute of Computer Science, Shah Abdul Latif University Khairpur, Pakistan.
Rafaqat Hussain ArainInstitute of Computer Science, Shah Abdul Latif University Khairpur, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Date fruit grading and inspection is a challenging and crucial process in the industry. The grading process requires skilled and experienced labour. Moreover, the labour turnover in the date processing industries has been increased regularly. Therefore, due to the lack of trained labour, the quality of date fruit is often compromised. It leads to fruit wastage and instability of fruit prices. Currently, deep learning algorithms have achieved the research community's attention in solving the problems in the agriculture sector. The pre-trained models like VGG16 and VGG19 have been applied for the classification of date fruit [1,2]. Furthermore, machine learning techniques like K-Nearest Neighbors, Support Vector Machine, Random Forest and a few others [3], [4], [5], [6] have been used for grading of date fruit. Therefore, classification and sorting of date fruit problems have become common in the industry. The classification and grading of date fruit needed a neat and clean dataset. In this article, an indigenous and state-of-the-art dataset of date fruit is offered. The dataset contains images of four date fruit varieties. It consists of 3004 pre-processed images of different classes and grades. Moreover, images have been sorted based on size as large, medium, and small. Additionally, it is graded based on the quality as grade 1, grade 2, and grade 3. This dataset is separated into eighteen different directories for the facilitation of the researchers. It may contribute to develop an intelligent system to grade and inspect date fruit. This system may add value to the sustainable economic growth of fruit processing industries and farmers locally and internationally.

Indexed as

Agriculture scienceArtificial IntelligenceClassificationDeep learningMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID38260861
PMCPMC10801328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.