Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38260857›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023

Pharyngeal reconstruction after total laryngectomy with sliding epiglottis: technical aspects with retrospective review.

Aleš Grošelj, Ivana Tancer, Anže Jerman, Jošt Paučič, Luka Pušnik

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Infrahyoid Myocutaneous Flaps with Common Wall of Hypopharyngeal and Esophageal Serosas for Voice Rehabilitation After Total Laryngectomy.Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Aleš GrošeljDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Cervicofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Ivana TancerFotona d.o.o., Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Anže JermanDepartment of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, University Medical Center Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Jošt PaučičDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Cervicofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Luka PušnikInstitute of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Ljubljana University Medical Centre · SIUniversity of Ljubljana · SIFotona (Slovenia) · SI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Several techniques have been employed for defect reconstruction after total laryngectomy, among others sliding epiglottoplasty. As there is a paucity of data on sliding epiglottoplasty after total laryngectomy, this study aimed to present this reconstruction technique in detail with the retrospective analysis of the patients. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed single-center medical records of patients who underwent pharyngeal reconstruction after total laryngectomy between 2007-2013, with a follow-up to 2020. The study included patients who had total laryngectomy performed followed by a primary closure or sliding epiglottoplasty. The patients were divided according to the pharyngeal reconstruction technique: sliding epiglottis ( Results: The baseline characteristics of patients, TNM stages, and previous treatment strategies did not differ significantly between the sliding epiglottis and primary closure group. The postoperative complication rates, including the pharyngocutaneous fistulae formation and strictures were comparable between the analyzed groups; however, a slightly higher incidence of pharyngocutaneus fistulae was noted within the patients after sliding epiglottoplasty. Overall 3-year survival of patients who underwent the epiglottoplasty and primary closure group were 73.7% Conclusions: Sliding epiglottoplasty is considered a safe reconstruction technique. Although slightly better outcomes were noted within the epiglottoplasty group, it is still considered inferior to the primary closure. This technique ought to be considered in meticulously selected patients in whom primary closure is not feasible, epiglottis with nearby structures is spared from disease, and when the distal flaps are less appropriate or contraindicated.

Indexed as

defect reconstructionepiglottoplastyneopharynxprimary closuretotal laryngectomy

Identifiers

PMID38260857
PMCPMC10801030
OpenAlexW4390664681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.