ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023
Investigating chromosomal instability in long-term survivors with glioblastoma and grade 4 astrocytoma.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Combining panel-based and whole-transcriptome-based gene fusion detection by long-read sequencing.Cell reports methods · 2025Article
- Review
- Genetic and epigenetic instability as an underlying driver of progression and aggressive behavior in IDH-mutant astrocytoma.Acta neuropathologica · 2024Review
- Expression of STAT3 and hypoxia markers in long-term surviving malignant glioma patients.BMC cancer · 2024Article
- Chromosomal instability is associated with paradoxical cGAS upregulation and impaired STING signaling shaping the immune microenvironment in glioblastoma.Neuro-oncology advancesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Only a small group of patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) survives more than 36 months, so-called long-term survivors. Recent studies have shown that chromosomal instability (CIN) plays a prognostic and predictive role among different cancer types. Here, we compared histological (chromosome missegregation) and bioinformatic metrics (CIN signatures) of CIN in tumors of GBM typical survivors (≤36 months overall survival), GBM long-term survivors and isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-mutant grade 4 astrocytomas. Methods: Tumor sections of all gliomas were examined for anaphases and chromosome missegregation. Further CIN signature activity analysis in the The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA)-GBM cohort was performed. Results: Our data show that chromosome missegregation is pervasive in high grade gliomas and is not different between the 3 groups. We find only limited evidence of altered CIN levels in tumors of GBM long-term survivors relative to the other groups, since a significant depletion in CIN signature 11 relative to GBM typical survivors was the only alteration detected. In contrast, within IDH-mutant grade 4 astrocytomas we detected a significant enrichment of CIN signature 5 and 10 activities and a depletion of CIN signature 1 activity relative to tumors of GBM typical survivors. Conclusions: Our data suggest that CIN is pervasive in high grade gliomas, however this is unlikely to be a major contributor to the phenomenon of long-term survivorship in GBM. Nevertheless, further evaluation of specific types of CIN (signatures) could have prognostic value in patients suffering from grade 4 gliomas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.