ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023
Atypical presentations of UTUC: a case report of three patients.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Upper tract urothelial carcinoma mimicking emphysematous pyelonephritis: a diagnostic challenge case report.International journal of surgery case reports · 2026Article
- Review
- Renal pelvic urothelial carcinoma with imaging features presenting as renal infarction 1 case report and literature review.Urology case reports · 2025Article
- A rare case of primary invasive urothelial carcinoma of the renal pelvis and calyx: a case report.Ecancermedicalscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a rare clinical condition primarily characterized by symptoms such as gross or microscopic hematuria, flank pain, and renal colic. Although computed tomography urography (CTU) is currently the most accurate imaging modality for diagnosis, atypical presentations and physical examination findings can sometimes obscure lesions, posing diagnostic challenges. Case presentation: In this report, three patients exhibited atypical symptoms, sharing a common complaint of flank pain. Notably, the first patient, who had recently undergone laparoscopic right duplex nephrectomy, presented with microscopic hematuria, whereas the other two did not show any gross or microscopic hematuria. Computed tomography urography revealed hydronephrosis and infection without significant renal pelvic space-occupying lesions, with persistently elevated white blood cell (WBC) counts, but no fever. These atypical clinical presentations confounded clinicians, delaying the diagnosis of upper tract urothelial carcinoma until postoperative pathological examination for the first two patients and resulting in advanced-stage diagnosis for the third patient. Postoperative pathology confirmed high-grade invasive upper tract urothelial carcinoma in all three patients. Conclusion: Upper tract urothelial carcinoma can manifest atypically without hematuria and may be challenging to visualize on computed tomography urography, potentially leading to misdiagnosis. Therefore, clinicians should maintain a high level of suspicion for malignant tumors when patients exhibit hydronephrosis, infection on imaging, and persistently elevated white blood cell counts without fever, even in the absence of typical signs of upper urothelial carcinoma on computed tomography urography.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.