Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38260828›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2023

Vats lobectomy for lung cancer. What has been the evolution over the time?

Emanuela Re Cecconi, Giuseppe Mangiameli, Matilde De Simone, Ugo Cioffi, Giuseppe Marulli, Alberto Testori

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Body mass index as a predictor of postoperative complications after anatomical lung resection.Kardiochirurgia i torakochirurgia polska = Polish journal of cardio-thoracic surgery · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Emanuela Re CecconiDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Thoracic Surgery, Tor Vergata University Polyclinic, Rome, Italy.
Giuseppe MangiameliDivision of Thoracic Surgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Matilde De SimoneDepartment of Surgery, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Ugo CioffiDepartment of Surgery, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Giuseppe MarulliDivision of Thoracic Surgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Alberto TestoriDivision of Thoracic Surgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Video assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lobectomy is the treatment of choice for early-stage lung cancer. It is safe and effective compared to open surgery, as demonstrated by a large body of scientific evidence over the last few decades. VATS lobectomy's evolution was driven by the need to decrease post-operative pain by reducing the extent of surgical accesses, maintaining the same oncological efficacy of open lobectomy with less invasiveness. VATS lobectomy just turned 30 years old, evolving and changing significantly from its origins. The aim of this mini review is to retrace the history, starting from a multiport approach to a single port approach. At the end of this mini review, we will discuss the advanced and the future challenges of the technique that has revolutionized thoracic surgery.

Indexed as

lung cancerthoracic surgeryuniportal VATSVATS (video-assisted thoracic surgery)video-assisted thoracic surgery

Identifiers

PMID38260828
PMCPMC10800971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.