Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38260782›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2023

Preliminary evidence for the acceptability, safety, and efficacy of the flash technique.

Philip E Manfield, Graham Taylor, Edie Dornbush, Lewis Engel, Ricky Greenwald

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06758635 (Online Versions of Single Sessions Virtual Reality), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06758635 nacompletednot on this map

Online Versions of Single Sessions Virtual Reality (VR) Therapy and EMDR Flash Therapy on the Treatment of Flying Fear

TypeinterventionalSponsorIbn Haldun UniversityRan2023 to 2024Enrolled89ConditionsFear of FlyingArmsVRET-O Group, Flash-O Group, PYSCHOEDU-O Group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Philip E Manfield *Independent Practice, Albany, CA, United States.
Graham Taylor *Therapist-Training, Perth, WA, Australia.
Edie Dornbush *Independent Practice, Woodland, CA, United States.
Lewis Engel *Independent Practice, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Ricky Greenwald *Trauma Institute, Northampton, MA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: This study reports on four similar studies intended to explore the acceptability, safety, and efficacy of the flash technique (FT), a method of rapidly reducing the intensity of a disturbing memory or image, with minimal subjective disturbance for subjects during the process. Of the four studies, two were conducted during FT trainings in the United States, one in Australia, and one in Uganda. Methods: The studies involve pre-, post-, and follow-up repeated-measures design to determine the effectiveness of a 15-min FT intervention. A total of 654 subjects were asked to think of a disturbing memory and then participate in a structured experience of an FT. The purpose of this investigation was to determine whether a brief application of an FT would be safe and effective in significantly reducing their disturbance. In each study, subjects rated their disturbing memories on a 0-to-10 scale, with zero representing no disturbance at all and 10 representing the worst they could imagine. Then, they took part in a 15-min group practicum where they were guided in a self-administering FT with no individual supervision or support. Results: In all four studies, the mean reduction in disturbance exceeded two-thirds, the results were significant ( Conclusion: These findings provide preliminary evidence of acceptability, safety, and efficacy of FT; therefore, further study is warranted.

Indexed as

EMDReye movement desensitization and reprocessingflashbackflash techniquepainlessreexperiencingsubliminaltrauma

Identifiers

PMID38260782
PMCPMC10801180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.