Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38260678›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025

Estimating Disorder Probability Based on Polygenic Prediction Using the BPC Approach.

Emil Uffelmann, Major Depressive Disorder Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium, Schizophrenia Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium, Alkes L Price, Danielle Posthuma, Wouter J Peyrot

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Major Depressive Disorder Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium
Schizophrenia Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium
Danielle PosthumaORCID 0000-0001-7582-2365

Funding

Methods for Genome-wide Association Studies in Admixed PopulationsR01HG006399 · NHGRI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY D/B/A HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI PRICE, ALKES L · 2011 to 2024
$6.3M
5/7 Psychiatric Genomics Consortium: Advancing Discovery and ImpactR01MH124873 · NIMH · CARDIFF UNIVERSITY · PI LEWIS, CATHRYN, O'DONOVAN, MICHAEL · 2021 to 2025
$2.6M
1/7 Psychiatric Genomics Consortium: Finding actionable variationU01MH109528 · NIMH · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI SULLIVAN, PATRICK F · 2016 to 2020
$2.5M
3/7 Psychiatric Genomics Consortium: Advancing Discovery and ImpactR01MH124839 · NIMH · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI ANDREASSEN, OLE A, HUCKINS, LAURA MARIANNE · 2021 to 2025
$2.0M
1/4 Psychiatric GWAS Consortium: Genomic Follow-up Next-Gen Sequencing & GenotypiU01MH094421 · NIMH · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI SULLIVAN, PATRICK F · 2012 to 2015
$1.9M
1/5-The Psychiatric GWAS Consortium: Integrated & Coordinated GWAS Meta-AnalysesU01MH085520 · NIMH · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI SULLIVAN, PATRICK F · 2008 to 2008
$642k
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG006399NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH124839NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH124873NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH085520NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH094421NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH109528
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polygenic Scores (PGSs) summarize an individual's genetic propensity for a given trait in a single value based on SNP effect sizes derived from Genome-Wide Association Study (GWAS) results. Methods have been developed that apply Bayesian approaches to improve the prediction accuracy of PGSs through optimization of estimated effect sizes. While these methods are generally well-calibrated for continuous traits (implying the predicted values are, on average, equal to the true trait values), they are not well-calibrated for binary disorder traits in ascertained samles. This is a problem because well-calibrated PGSs are needed to reliably compute the absolute disorder probability for an individual to facilitate future clinical implementation. Here, we introduce the Bayesian polygenic score Probability Conversion (BPC) approach, which computes an individual's predicted disorder probability using GWAS summary statistics, an existing Bayesian PGS method (e.g., PRScs, SBayesR), the individual's genotype data, and a prior disorder probability (which can be specified flexibly, based on e.g., literature, small reference samples, or prior elicitation). The BPC approach transforms the PGS to its underlying liability scale, computes the variances of the PGS in cases and controls, and applies Bayes' Theorem to compute the absolute disorder probability; it is practical in its application as it does not require a tuning sample with both genotype and phenotype data. We applied the BPC approach to extensive simulated data and empirical data of nine disorders. The BPC approach yielded well-calibrated results that were consistently better than the results of another recently published approach.

Identifiers

PMID38260678
PMCPMC10802765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.