ArticleResearch square2024
Stigma and Associated Sex Disparities Among Patients with Tuberculosis in Uganda: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Research square, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Tuberculosis (TB) is one of the leading causes of death from a single infectious agent globally. Stigma associated with TB encompassing self-, anticipated-, and public-stigma has significant negative effects on treatment adherence. In Uganda, limited data exist on the prevalence of stigma and its relationship with sex among patients with TB. We evaluate prevalence of three types of stigma and their relationship with the sex of patients undergoing TB treatment. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted between July 2020 to March 2021 at selected TB clinics in Kampala, Uganda. Eligible participants were aged 18-65 with confirmed TB and starting their prescribed treatment. We collected data on socio-demographics and used 13 items to capture the self-, anticipated-, and public-stigma from which we composed the dependent variables. The primary independent variable was sex. We employed multivariable logistic regression analysis to evaluate the association between sex and the three stigma types. Additionally, we considered potential confounders such as age, HIV, and employment status. Statistical significance was defined as p<0.05. Results: In this study we enrolled 144 participants with a mean age of 35.8 years (standard deviation = 12). Half of the participants (50%, n=72) were female, 44% had a secondary education, 37.5% were unemployed, and 32.6% were co-infected with HIV. The prevalence of self-stigma was 71.1%, anticipated stigma was 75.7%, and public stigma was 41.7%. Significant factors were associated with self-stigma were female sex (adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 2.35 95% CI: 1.02-5.74) and unemployment (AOR: 2.95 95% CI: 1.16-8.58). HIV-positive status was significantly associated with anticipated stigma (AOR: 3.58 95% CI: 1.38-11.23). However, none of the variables we evaluated showed a significant association with public stigma. Conclusions: Our study showed a high prevalence of self, anticipated and public stigma among TB patients. Notably, females and unemployed individuals were at a higher risk of self-stigma, while those with HIV/AIDS and TB were more likely to report anticipated stigma. To combat stigma effectively, interventions should be tailored to cater to sex-specific needs and persons living with HIV. Future research should delve further in determinants of TB-related stigma in high-burden settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.