Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38260333›Full record

ArticleResearch square2024

Supraspinal control of motoneurons after paralysis enabled by spinal cord stimulation.

Marco Capogrosso, Josep-Maria Balaguer, Genis Prat-Ortega, Nikhil Verma, Prakarsh Yadav, Erynn Sorensen, Roberto de Freitas, Scott Ensel, Luigi Borda, Serena Donadio and 9 more

Open access · greenAbstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in Research square, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Marco CapogrossoUniversity of Pittsburgh.ORCID 0000-0002-0975-316X
Josep-Maria BalaguerRehab and Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7792-6376
Genis Prat-OrtegaUniversity of Pittsburgh.
Nikhil VermaCarnegie Mellon University.
Prakarsh YadavCarnegie Mellon University.
Erynn SorensenUniversity of Pittsburgh.
Roberto de FreitasUniversity of Pittsburgh.
Scott EnselUniversity of Pittsburg.
Luigi BordaCarnegie Mellon University.
Serena DonadioUniversity of Pittsburgh.
Lucy LiangUniversity of Pittsburgh.
Jonathan HoUniversity of Pittsburgh.
Arianna DamianiUniversity of Pittsburgh.
Erinn GrigsbyUniversity of Pittsburgh.
Daryl FieldsUPMC.
Jorge Gonzalez-MartinezCleveland Clinic.
Peter GersztenUPMC.
Douglas WeberCarnegie Mellon University.
Elvira PirondiniUniversity of Pittsburgh.
University of Pittsburgh · USCarnegie Mellon University · USUPMC Health System · USCleveland Clinic · USPittsburg State University · US

Funding

Spinal Cord Stimulation to Improve Motor Function in People with Post-Stroke HemiplegiaUG3NS123135 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI CAPOGROSSO, MARCO, WEBER, DOUGLAS J · 2022 to 2024
$4.7M
NINDS NIH HHS UG3 NS123135
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) restores motor control after spinal cord injury (SCI) and stroke. This evidence led to the hypothesis that SCS facilitates residual supraspinal inputs to spinal motoneurons. Instead, here we show that SCS does not facilitate residual supraspinal inputs but directly triggers motoneurons action potentials. However, supraspinal inputs can shape SCS-mediated activity, mimicking volitional control of motoneuron firing. Specifically, by combining simulations, intraspinal electrophysiology in monkeys and single motor unit recordings in humans with motor paralysis, we found that residual supraspinal inputs transform subthreshold SCS-induced excitatory postsynaptic potentials into suprathreshold events. We then demonstrated that only a restricted set of stimulation parameters enables volitional control of motoneuron firing and that lesion severity further restricts the set of effective parameters. Our results explain the facilitation of voluntary motor control during SCS while predicting the limitations of this neurotechnology in cases of severe loss of supraspinal axons.

Identifiers

PMID38260333
PMCPMC10802737
OpenAlexW4390738616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.