Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38260330›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024

A toxic environment selects for specialist microbiome in poison frogs.

Stephanie N Caty, Aurora Alvarez-Buylla, Cooper Vasek, Elicio E Tapia, Nora A Martin, Theresa McLaughlin, Peter K Weber, Xavier Mayali, Luis A Coloma, Megan M Morris and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Stephanie N CatyDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford CA, USA.
Aurora Alvarez-BuyllaDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford CA, USA.
Cooper VasekDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford CA, USA.
Elicio E TapiaLeibniz Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity Change Martin-Luther-King-Platz 3 20146 Hamburg, Germany.
Nora A MartinDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford CA, USA.
Theresa McLaughlinStanford University Mass Spectrometry, Stanford University, Stanford CA, USA.
Peter K WeberPhysical and Life Sciences Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore CA, USA.
Xavier MayaliPhysical and Life Sciences Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore CA, USA.
Luis A ColomaCentro Jambatu de Investigación y Conservación de Anfibios, Fundación Jambatu, San Rafael, Quito, Ecuador.
Megan M MorrisPhysical and Life Sciences Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore CA, USA.
Lauren A O'ConnellDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2706-4077
Stanford University · USLawrence Livermore National Laboratory · USCentro Jambatu de Investigación y Conservación de Anfibios · ECSenckenberg am Meer · DE

Funding

Translational Oncology Research Program (Project-005)P30CA124435 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MICHAEL KENNEY · 2007 to 2026
$71.4M
Dietary tuning of infant social communicationDP2HD102042 · NICHD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI O'CONNELL, LAUREN A · 2019 to 2021
$2.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA124435NICHD NIH HHS DP2 HD102042
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Shifts in microbiome community composition can have large effects on host health. It is therefore important to understand how perturbations, like those caused by the introduction of exogenous chemicals, modulate microbiome community composition. In poison frogs within the family Dendrobatidae, the skin microbiome is exposed to the alkaloids that the frogs sequester from their diet and use for defense. Given the demonstrated antimicrobial effects of these poison frog alkaloids, these compounds may be structuring the skin microbial community. To test this, we first characterized microbial communities from chemically defended and closely related non-defended frogs from Ecuador. Then we conducted a laboratory experiment to monitor the effect of the alkaloid decahydroquinoline (DHQ) on the microbiome of a single frog species. In both the field and lab experiments, we found that alkaloid-exposed microbiomes are more species rich and phylogenetically diverse, with an increase in rare taxa. To better understand the strain-specific behavior in response to alkaloids, we cultured microbial strains from poison frog skin and found the majority of strains exhibited either enhanced growth or were not impacted by the addition of DHQ. Additionally, stable isotope tracing coupled to nanoSIMS suggests that some of these strains are able to metabolize DHQ. Taken together, these data suggest that poison frog chemical defenses open new niches for skin-associated microbes with specific adaptations, including the likely metabolism of alkaloids, that enable their survival in this toxic environment. This work helps expand our understanding of how exposure to exogenous compounds like alkaloids can impact host microbiomes.

Indexed as

alkaloidsDendrobatidaemicrobial ecologyNanoSIMSpoison frog

Identifiers

PMID38260330
PMCPMC10802471
OpenAlexW4390719514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.