ArticleResearch square2024
Artificial Intelligence to derive aligned strain in cine CMR to detect patients with myocardial fibrosis: an open and scrutinizable approach.
Article in Research square, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Cine Cardiac Magnetic Resonance (CMR) is the gold standard for cardiac function evaluation, incorporating ejection fraction (EF) and strain as vital indicators of abnormal deformation. Rare pathologies like Duchenne muscular dystrophies (DMD) are monitored with repeated late gadolinium-enhanced (LGE) CMR for identification of myocardial fibrosis. However, it is judicious to reduce repeated gadolinium exposure and rather employ strain analysis from cine CMR. This solution is limited so far since full strain curves are not comparable between individual cardiac cycles and current practice mainly neglects diastolic deformation patterns. Our novel Deep Learning-based approach derives strain values aligned by key frames throughout the cardiac cycle. In a reproducibility scenario (57+82 patients), our results reveal five times more significant differences (22 vs. 4) between patients with scar and without, enhancing scar detection by +30%, improving detection of patients with preserved EF by +61%, with an overall sensitivity/specificity of 82/81%.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.