ArticleAdvances in radiation oncology2024
Initial Observation of Contrast Profiles for 2-Dimensional and 3-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Sequences in Magnetic Resonance-Guided Radiation Therapy for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer.
Article in Advances in radiation oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: In our experience treating locally advanced pancreatic cancer with magnetic resonance-guided radiation therapy (MRgRT), the true-fast imaging with steady-state free precession sequences used to generate both the real-time 2-dimensional (2D) magnetic resonance images (MRI; 2D cine) and the pretreatment high-resolution 3-dimensional (3D) MRI impart differing intensities for relevant structures between the 2 scans. Since these variations can confound target tracking selection, we propose that an understanding of the differing contrast profiles could improve selection of tracking structures. Methods and Materials: We retrospectively reviewed both 2D cine and 3D MRI images for 20 patients with pancreatic cancer treated with MRgRT. At simulation, an appropriate tracking target was identified and contoured on a single 3-mm sagittal slice of the 3D MRI. This sagittal slice was directly compared with the coregistered 7-mm 2D cine to identify structures with notable discrepancies in signal intensity. The 3D MRI was then explored in additional planes to confirm structure identities. For quantitative verification of the clinically observed differences, the pixel intensity distributions of 2D cine and 3D MRI digital imaging and communications in medicine data sets were statistically compared. Results: In all patients reviewed, arteries (aorta, celiac, superior mesenteric artery, hepatic artery) appeared mildly hyperintense on both scans. However, veins (portal vein, superior mesenteric vein) appeared hyperintense on 2D cine but isointense on 3D MRI. Biliary structures appeared mildly hyperintense on 2D cine but starkly hyperintense on 3D MRI. The pixel intensity distributions extracted from 2D cine and 3D MRI images were confirmed to differ significantly (2 sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test; test statistic, 0.40; Conclusions: There are significant variations in image intensity between the immediate pretreatment 2D cine compared with the initial planning 3D MRI. Understanding variations of image intensity between the different MRI sequences used in MRgRT is valuable to radiation oncologists and may lead to improved target tracking and optimized treatment delivery.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.