Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38260219›Full record

ArticleAdvances in radiation oncology2024

A Technique to Enable Efficient Adaptive Radiation Therapy: Automated Contouring of Prostate and Adjacent Organs.

Daniel E Hyer, Joseph Caster, Blake Smith, Joel St-Aubin, Jeffrey Snyder, Andrew Shepard, Honghai Zhang, Sean Mullan, Theodore Geoghegan, Benjamin George and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in radiation oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. MR-linac: role of artificial intelligence and automation.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel E HyerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa.
Joseph CasterDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa.
Blake SmithDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa.
Joel St-AubinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa.
Jeffrey SnyderDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa.
Andrew ShepardDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa.
Honghai ZhangIowa Institute for Biomedical Imaging, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.
Sean MullanIowa Institute for Biomedical Imaging, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.
Theodore GeogheganDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa.
Benjamin GeorgeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa.
James ByrneDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa.
Mark SmithDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa.
John M BuattiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa.
Milan SonkaIowa Institute for Biomedical Imaging, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.
University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics · USUniversity of Iowa · US

Funding

Viral VectorP30CA086862 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI Christopher K Laubenthal · 2000 to 2026
$70.0M
Graph-Based Medical Image Segmentation in 3D and 4DR01EB004640 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI BUATTI, JOHN M, SONKA, MILAN · 2006 to 2022
$6.1M
Iowa Lung Imaging Training ProgramT32HL144461 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI HOFFMAN, ERIC ALFRED, REINHARDT, JOSEPH M · 2019 to 2023
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA086862NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL144461NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB004640
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this work was to investigate the use of a segmentation approach that could potentially improve the speed and reproducibility of contouring during magnetic resonance-guided adaptive radiation therapy. Methods and Materials: The segmentation algorithm was based on a hybrid deep neural network and graph optimization approach that also allows rapid user intervention (Deep layered optimal graph image segmentation of multiple objects and surfaces [LOGISMOS] + just enough interaction [JEI]). A total of 115 magnetic resonance-data sets were used for training and quantitative assessment. Expert segmentations were used as the independent standard for the prostate, seminal vesicles, bladder, rectum, and femoral heads for all 115 data sets. In addition, 3 independent radiation oncologists contoured the prostate, seminal vesicles, and rectum for a subset of patients such that the interobserver variability could be quantified. Consensus contours were then generated from these independent contours using a simultaneous truth and performance level estimation approach, and the deviation of Deep LOGISMOS + JEI contours to the consensus contours was evaluated and compared with the interobserver variability. Results: The absolute accuracy of Deep LOGISMOS + JEI generated contours was evaluated using median absolute surface-to-surface distance which ranged from a minimum of 0.20 mm for the bladder to a maximum of 0.93 mm for the prostate compared with the independent standard across all data sets. The median relative surface-to-surface distance was less than 0.17 mm for all organs, indicating that the Deep LOGISMOS + JEI algorithm did not exhibit a systematic under- or oversegmentation. Interobserver variability testing yielded a mean absolute surface-to-surface distance of 0.93, 1.04, and 0.81 mm for the prostate, seminal vesicles, and rectum, respectively. In comparison, the deviation of Deep LOGISMOS + JEI from consensus simultaneous truth and performance level estimation contours was 0.57, 0.64, and 0.55 mm for the same organs. On average, the Deep LOGISMOS algorithm took less than 26 seconds for contour segmentation. Conclusions: Deep LOGISMOS + JEI segmentation efficiently generated clinically acceptable prostate and normal tissue contours, potentially limiting the need for time intensive manual contouring with each fraction.

Identifiers

PMID38260219
PMCPMC10801646
OpenAlexW4385633360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.