Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38260136›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2023

Treatment modalities favoring outcome in well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors G3.

Martina Hinterleitner, Ruben Pfeiffer, Nils F Trautwein, Bence Sipos, Stephan Singer, Silvio Nadalin, Alfred Königsrainer, Ulrich M Lauer, Christian la Fougère, Lars Zender and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Martina HinterleitnerDepartment of Medical Oncology and Pneumology (Internal Medicine VIII), University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Ruben PfeifferDepartment of Medical Oncology and Pneumology (Internal Medicine VIII), University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Nils F TrautweinEuropean Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS) Center of Excellence, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Bence SiposDepartment of Medical Oncology and Pneumology (Internal Medicine VIII), University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Stephan SingerEuropean Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS) Center of Excellence, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Silvio NadalinEuropean Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS) Center of Excellence, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Alfred KönigsrainerEuropean Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS) Center of Excellence, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Ulrich M LauerDepartment of Medical Oncology and Pneumology (Internal Medicine VIII), University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Christian la FougèreEuropean Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS) Center of Excellence, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Lars ZenderDepartment of Medical Oncology and Pneumology (Internal Medicine VIII), University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Clemens HinterleitnerDepartment of Medical Oncology and Pneumology (Internal Medicine VIII), University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society · DEUniversity of Tübingen · DEDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft · DEMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) are a rare and heterogenous group of tumors arising from neuroendocrine cells in multiple organs. Neuroendocrine tumors (NET) G3 encompass a small subgroup accounting for less than 10% of all neuroendocrine neoplasms. In contrast to NET G1 and G2 as well as neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC), in NET G3 data on treatment and patient outcomes are still limited. Especially in a metastasized tumor stage, the role of surgery, peptide receptor radionucleotide therapy (PRRT), and systemic chemotherapy is not clearly defined. Methods: In this real-life cohort, we consecutively analyzed clinical outcome in NET G3 patients receiving different diagnostic and treatment. Results and discussion: We found that even metastasized NET G3 patients undergoing surgery, or receiving radiation, somatostatin analogues (SSA), and PRRT showed a clear survival benefit. Interestingly, all treatment regimen were superior to classical chemotherapeutic agents. In addition, somatostatin receptor (SSTR) PET-CT, FDG PET-CT, and repetitive biopsies were shown to be useful diagnostic and prognostic tools in NET G3. Our study demonstrates that patients with highly proliferative NET G3 might benefit from less aggressive treatment modalities commonly used in low proliferative NEN.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, NeuroendocrineNeuroendocrine TumorsBiopsyHumansPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyG3gradingneuroendocrine tumorPETsomatostatin receptortreatment

Identifiers

PMID38260136
PMCPMC10800837
OpenAlexW4390666625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.