ReviewFrontiers in plant science2023
CRISPR technology towards genome editing of the perennial and semi-perennial crops citrus, coffee and sugarcane.
Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genome association of carbohydrate metabolites provides new insights toward functional breeding in coffee.The plant genome · 2026Article
- Beyond GMOs: transgene-free gene-edited crops for global food security.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- Cas9/sgRNA-mediated genome editing of citrus via mature tissue transformation enables both high-efficacy genome editing and early flowering.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Efficient and cost-effective shoot regeneration in Aguaymanto (Physalis peruviana L.) using meta-Topolin and 6-benzylaminopurine combinations.Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2025Article
- Transgene-free genome editing in citrus and poplar trees using positive and negative selection markers.Plant cell reports · 2025Article
- Abscission zones: cellular interfaces for the programmed separation of organs.Annals of botany · 2025Review
- Directed mutagenesis in fruit crops.3 Biotech · 2025Review
- RNAi and genome editing of sugarcane: Progress and prospects.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2025Review
- Consumer traits of common beans: a global and regional perspective on seed coat darkening, cooking time, protein, and mineral content.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Review
- Recent developments, challenges and opportunities in genome editing for crop science from a societal perspective.Frontiers in genome editing · 2025Review
- CRISPR/Cas technology: fueling the future of Biofuel production with sugarcane.Functional & integrative genomics · 2024Review
- An efficient multiplex approach to CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing in citrus.Plant methods · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gene editing technologies have opened up the possibility of manipulating the genome of any organism in a predicted way. CRISPR technology is the most used genome editing tool and, in agriculture, it has allowed the expansion of possibilities in plant biotechnology, such as gene knockout or knock-in, transcriptional regulation, epigenetic modification, base editing, RNA editing, prime editing, and nucleic acid probing or detection. This technology mostly depends on
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.