ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2024
Indoor surface classification for mobile robots.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The ability to recognize the surface type is crucial for both indoor and outdoor mobile robots. Knowing the surface type can help indoor mobile robots move more safely and adjust their movement accordingly. However, recognizing surface characteristics is challenging since similar planes can appear substantially different; for instance, carpets come in various types and colors. To address this inherent uncertainty in vision-based surface classification, this study first generates a new, unique data set composed of 2,081 surface images (carpet, tiles, and wood) captured in different indoor environments. Secondly, the pre-trained state-of-the-art deep learning models, namely InceptionV3, VGG16, VGG19, ResNet50, Xception, InceptionResNetV2, and MobileNetV2, were utilized to recognize the surface type. Additionally, a lightweight MobileNetV2-modified model was proposed for surface classification. The proposed model has approximately four times fewer total parameters than the original MobileNetV2 model, reducing the size of the trained model weights from 42 MB to 11 MB. Thus, the proposed model can be used in robotic systems with limited computational capacity and embedded systems. Lastly, several optimizers, such as SGD, RMSProp, Adam, Adadelta, Adamax, Adagrad, and Nadam, are applied to distinguish the most efficient network. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed model outperforms all other applied methods and existing approaches in the literature by achieving 99.52% accuracy and an average score of 99.66% in precision, recall, and F1-score. In addition to this, the proposed lightweight model was tested in real-time on a mobile robot in 11 scenarios consisting of various indoor environments such as offices, hallways, and homes, resulting in an accuracy of 99.25%. Finally, each model was evaluated in terms of model loading time and processing time. The proposed model requires less loading and processing time than the other models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.