Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38259745›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2023

Continuity of care for patients with dementia during COVID-19 pandemic: flexibility and integration between in-person and remote visits.

Daniele Emedoli, Elise Houdayer, Pasquale Anthony Della Rosa, Alice Zito, Luigia Brugliera, Paolo Cimino, Jeffrey David Padul, Andrea Tettamanti, Sandro Iannaccone, Federica Alemanno

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07722169 (Home-based Virtual Reality Cognitive Training as an add-on to Telerehabilitation in Alzheimer's Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07722169 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Home-based Virtual Reality Cognitive Training as an add-on to Telerehabilitation in Alzheimer's Disease: Validation of a Protocol to Slow Down Cognitive Decline and Reduce Caregivers' Burden

TypeinterventionalSponsorIRCCS San RaffaeleRan2026 to 2029Enrolled48ConditionsAlzheimerArmsOnline cognitive telerehabilitation, VRRS tablet
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Daniele EmedoliDepartment of Rehabilitation and Functional Recovery, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Elise HoudayerDepartment of Rehabilitation and Functional Recovery, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Pasquale Anthony Della RosaDepartment of Neuroradiology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Alice ZitoDepartment of Rehabilitation and Functional Recovery, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Luigia BruglieraDepartment of Rehabilitation and Functional Recovery, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Paolo CiminoDepartment of Rehabilitation and Functional Recovery, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Jeffrey David PadulDepartment of Rehabilitation and Functional Recovery, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Andrea TettamantiDepartment of Rehabilitation and Functional Recovery, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Sandro IannacconeDepartment of Rehabilitation and Functional Recovery, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Federica AlemannoDepartment of Rehabilitation and Functional Recovery, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: During the pandemic, the Cognitive Disorders Unit of San Raffaele Hospital (Milan, Italy) offered patients the opportunity to undergo neuropsychological evaluations and cognitive training through telemedicine. Method: We conducted an investigation to assess how patients responded to this option and to determine if telemedicine could ensure continuity of care. Results: Between October 2019 and May 2022, a total of 5,768 telemedicine appointments and 8,190 in-person outpatient appointments were conducted, resulting in an increase in the rate of telemedicine activity from 16.81% in January 2020 to 23.21% in May 2022. Peaks in telemedicine activity reached 85.64% in May 2020 and 83.65% in February 2021, both representing a significant portion of the total activity. Interestingly, there was a notable positive correlation between telemedicine activity and the worsening of the Italian pandemic ( Discussion: During the peaks of contagion, the total number of visits remained stable, highlighting that telemedicine effectively served as a valuable and efficient tool to ensure continuity of care for vulnerable patients. This was evident from the integration of remote visits with in-person appointments.

Indexed as

COVID-19DementiaContinuity of Patient CareHumansOutpatientsPandemicscognitive disorderscognitive trainingcontinuity of careCOVID-19neuropsychologytelemedicinetelerehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID38259745
PMCPMC10800651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.