ArticleFrontiers in public health2023
The status quo of short videos as a health information source of
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- The quality and reliability of short videos about cervical spondylosis on TikTok and Redbook: a cross-sectional study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Article
- Quality and content evaluation of male HPV infection on Bilibili and TikTok: a cross-sectional study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Assessing the content and quality of deep vein thrombosis on Bilibili, TikTok, and YouTube: a cross-sectional study.Thrombosis journal · 2026Article
- Dietary Management After Ulcerative Colitis Surgery: A Thematic Analysis of TikTok Content.Nutrients · 2026Article
- The quality and reliability of short videos about depression on TikTok (Douyin): a cross-sectional study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Quality and reliability of weight management short videos on TikTok and Bilibili: cross-sectional study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Assessment of the quality and reliability of public health communication about hypertension on short video platforms in China.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Quality evaluation of health science popularization short videos related to cerebrovascular diseases on popular short video platforms in China: cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Quality Assessment of Shock Videos on Video Sharing Platforms: Cross-Sectional Study.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- Quality and dissemination of thyroid cancer information on short-video platforms a cross-platform evaluation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The Quality and Reliability of Short Videos About Melasma on TikTok and Bilibili: A Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2025Article
- Quality assessment of irritable bowel syndrome-related medical information on major video platforms in China: a cross-sectional study.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Quality and Reliability of Transarterial Chemoembolization Videos on TikTok and Bilibili: Cross-Sectional Content Analysis Study.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- Assessing the quality of myopia prevention videos on Chinese short video platforms: a cross-sectional content analysis by source.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Status of short videos as health information sources for chronic pancreatitis in China: a cross-sectional study.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Knowledge, attitude, and practice toward Helicobacter pylori among residents in Northeast China.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Assessing the content and quality of GI bleeding information on Bilibili, TikTok, and YouTube: a cross-sectional study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The reliability and quality of short videos as health information of guidance for bowel sounds: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Health education about Methods: A total of 242 Results: The median GQS score and DISCERN score was 2 for Conclusion: Generally, the content and quality of the information in
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.