Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38259641›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in aging neuroscience2023

Association between intracranial and extracranial atherosclerosis and white matter hyperintensities: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Wenyuan Zhang, Fangwang Fu, Zhenxiang Zhan

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Wenyuan ZhangDepartment of Neurology, Affiliated Yueqing Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Yueqing, China.
Fangwang FuDepartment of Neurology, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Zhenxiang ZhanDepartment of Neurology, Affiliated Jinhua Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Jinhua, China.
Second Affiliated Hospital & Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University · CNWenzhou Medical University · CNZhejiang University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: White matter hyperintensities (WMHs) are key neuroimaging markers of cerebral small vessel diseases. This study aimed to investigate whether intracranial and extracranial atherosclerotic stenosis is associated with WMHs. Methods: Following a previously registered protocol (PROSPERO protocol: CRD42023407465), PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase were systematically searched for relevant literature published until March 2023. Cross-sectional studies examining the association between intracranial and extracranial atherosclerotic stenosis and WMHs were included. Random effects models were used to calculate the pooled estimates. Results: Twenty-one eligible studies, including 10,841 participants, were identified. Intracranial and extracranial atherosclerotic stenosis was associated with an increased risk of WMHs (OR 1.80, 95% CI 1.25-2.57, Conclusion: Intracranial and extracranial atherosclerotic stenosis is associated with WMHs. This association is significant in ECAS, but attenuated in ICAS.

Indexed as

cerebral small vessel diseaseextracranial atherosclerosisintracranial atherosclerosismeta-analysiswhite matter hyperintensities

Identifiers

PMID38259641
PMCPMC10800362
OpenAlexW4390665291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.