Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38259529›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2023

Daily positive and negative affect during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Zorana Ivcevic, Shuting Shen, Shengjie Lin, David Cheng, Ryan Probasco, Ben Silbermann, Feng Zhang, Xihong Lin, Marc Brackett

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Zorana IvcevicYale Center for Emotional Intelligence, New Haven, CT, United States.
Shuting ShenDepartment of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States.
Shengjie LinYale Center for Emotional Intelligence, New Haven, CT, United States.
David ChengThe How We Feel Project, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Ryan ProbascoThe How We Feel Project, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Ben SilbermannThe How We Feel Project, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Feng ZhangThe How We Feel Project, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Xihong LinDepartment of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States.
Marc BrackettYale Center for Emotional Intelligence, New Haven, CT, United States.

Funding

Translational Research Support CoreP30ES000002 · NIEHS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (SCH OF PUBLIC HLTH) · PI JAIME ELIZABETH HART · 1985 to 2026
$44.6M
NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES000002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic influenced emotional experiences globally. We examined daily positive and negative affect between May/June 2020 and February 2021 (N = 151,049; 3,509,982 observations) using a convenience sample from a national mobile application-based survey that asked for daily affect reports. Four questions were examined: (1) How did people in the United States feel from May/June 2020 to February 2021?; (2) What demographic variables are related to positive and negative affect?; (3) What is the relationship between experienced stressors and daily affect?; and (4) What is the relationship between daily affect and preventive behavior? Positive affect increased, and negative decreased over time. Demographic differences mirrored those from before the pandemic (e.g., younger participants reported more negative and less positive affect). Stressors such as feeling unwell, experiencing COVID-19 symptoms, exposure to COVID-19, and lack of sleep were associated with less positive and more negative affect. Exercising protective behaviors predicted future affect, and affect also predicted future protective behaviors (e.g., less protective behavior when happy but more when grateful and thoughtful). The implications for public health communication were discussed.

Indexed as

COVID-19 pandemicdemographic differencesnegative affectpositive affectprotective behaviorstressors

Identifiers

PMID38259529
PMCPMC10800618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.