ArticleFrontiers in immunology2023
Anxiety disorders and adhesive capsulitis: a bidirectional Mendelian randomization study.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Rehabilitation of Frozen Shoulder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Multifactorial Interventions.Pain research & management · 2026Pooled it
- Adhesive capsulitis: current concepts.Musculoskeletal surgery · 2026Review
- Causal Relationship Between Depression and Traumatic Brain Injury: A Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization Analysis.Brain and behavior · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Previous epidemiological investigations and related research efforts consistently have outlined an observable association between anxiety disorders and adhesive capsulitis (AC). However, the intricate nature of the causal connection between these entities has yet to be fully clarified. Therefore, this investigative study aims to thoroughly examine and delineate the causal interrelationship between anxiety disorders and AC using a bidirectional, two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) approach. Methods: To pursue this inquiry, datasets related to anxiety disorders and AC were meticulously obtained from a publicly accessible genomewide association study. Instrumental variables, in the form of single nucleotide polymorphisms, were subsequently identified, undergoing a rigorous screening process that included intensity adjustment and the amelioration of linkage disequilibrium. The primary analytical tool for scrutinizing causal ramifications was the inverse variance weighting (IVW) methodology, complemented by supplementary analytical techniques such as weighted median, MR-Egger, simple mode, and weighted mode. Additionally, evaluations of heterogeneity and pleiotropy were meticulously conducted. Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran's Q-test in conjunction with the IVW and MR-Egger methods, while pleiotropy was appraised through the MR-Egger intercept and MR-PRESSO analysis methods. A leave-one-out analysis was undertaken to enhance the reliability of our findings. Finally, AC was utilized to infer reverse causality concerning the risk of anxiety disorders. Results: The random effects IVW analysis results yielded statistical significance ( Conclusion: In summary, our meticulously conducted study unequivocally supports the presence of a causal connection between anxiety disorders and an increased propensity for AC. Unfortunately, the reverse MR analysis failed to provide compelling evidence indicative of a reciprocal genetic causative relationship between AC and anxiety disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.