ArticleFrontiers in immunology2023
DNases improve effectiveness of antibiotic treatment in murine polymicrobial sepsis.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sequential clearance of neutrophil extracellular traps for precision therapy of sepsis.Science advances · 2026Article
- A biomimetic microphysiological system predicts the impact of sepsis therapeutics on neutrophil-endothelial dynamics.Lab on a chip · 2026Article
- Dysregulation of Neutrophil-Endothelial Communication in Sepsis: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Perspectives.Cells · 2026Review
- Cell-Free DNA-Based Theranostics for Inflammatory Disorders.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Cell-free DNA in sepsis: from molecular insights to clinical management.Military Medical Research · 2025Review
- Antioxidants as Modulators of NETosis: Mechanisms, Evidence, and Therapeutic Potential.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Advances in Necrotizing Fasciitis Animal Models: Current Trends and Future Perspectives.Journal of inflammation research · 2025Review
- Neutrophil extracellular traps in sepsis: trade-off between pros and cons.Burns & trauma · 2025Review
- Reflections on Targeting Neutrophil Extracellular Traps in Deep Vein Thrombosis.Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology · 2024Article
- The Dual Role of Neutrophil Extracellular Traps (NETs) in Sepsis and Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury: Comparative Analysis across Murine Models.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- NETworking for Health and in Disease: Neutrophil Extracellular Traps in Pediatric Surgical Care.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) have various beneficial and detrimental effects in the body. It has been reported that some bacteria may evade the immune system when entangled in NETs. Thus, the aim of the current study was to evaluate the effects of a combined DNase and antibiotic therapy in a murine model of abdominal sepsis. Methods: C57BL/6 mice underwent a cecum-ligation-and-puncture procedure. We used wild-type and knockout mice with the same genetic background (PAD4-KO and DNase1-KO). Mice were treated with (I) antibiotics (Metronidazol/Cefuroxime), (II) DNAse1, or (III) with the combination of both; mock-treated mice served as controls. We employed a streak plate procedure and 16s-RNA analysis to evaluate bacterial translocation and quantified NETs formation by ELISA and immune fluorescence. Western blot and proteomics analysis were used to determine inflammation. Results: A total of n=73 mice were used. Mice that were genetically unable to produce extended NETs or were treated with DNases displayed superior survival and bacterial clearance and reduced inflammation. DNase1 treatment significantly improved clearance of Gram-negative bacteria and survival rates. Importantly, the combination of DNase1 and antibiotics reduced tissue damage, neutrophil activation, and NETs formation in the affected intestinal tissue. Conclusion: The combination of antibiotics with DNase1 ameliorates abdominal sepsis. Gram-negative bacteria are cleared better when NETs are cleaved by DNase1. Future studies on antibiotic therapy should be combined with anti-NETs therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.