Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38259438›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2023

Transmission characteristics and inactivated vaccine effectiveness against transmission of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.2 variant in Shenzhen, China.

Xiaofeng He, Yuxue Liao, Yuanhao Liang, Jiexin Yu, Wei Gao, Jia Wan, Yi Liao, Jiao Su, Xuan Zou, Shixing Tang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Xiaofeng He *Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Yuxue Liao *Office of Emergency, Shenzhen Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shenzhen, China.
Yuanhao LiangDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Jiexin YuThird Class of 2019 of Clinical Medicine, Suzhou Medical College, Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Wei GaoOffice of Emergency, Shenzhen Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shenzhen, China.
Jia WanOffice of Emergency, Shenzhen Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shenzhen, China.
Yi LiaoOffice of Emergency, Shenzhen Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shenzhen, China.
Jiao SuDepartment of Biochemistry, Changzhi Medical College, Changzhi, China.
Xuan ZouOffice of Emergency, Shenzhen Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shenzhen, China.
Shixing TangDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Shenzhen Center for Disease Control and Prevention · CNSouthern Medical University · CNChangzhi Medical College · CNNanfang Hospital · CNSoochow University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We conducted a retrospective cohort study to evaluate the transmission risk of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Omicron BA.2 variant and the effectiveness of inactivated COVID-19 vaccine boosters in Shenzhen during a BA.2 outbreak period from 1 February to 21 April 2022. A total of 1,248 individuals were infected with the BA.2 variant, and 7,855 close contacts were carefully investigated. The risk factors for the high secondary attack rate of SARS-CoV-2 infection were household contacts [adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 1.748; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.448, 2.110], younger individuals aged 0-17 years (aOR: 2.730; 95% CI: 2.118, 3.518), older persons aged ≥60 years (aOR: 1.342; 95% CI: 1.135, 1.588), women (aOR: 1.442; 95% CI: 1.210, 1.718), and the subjects exposed to the post-onset index cases (aOR: 8.546; 95% CI: 6.610, 11.050), respectively. Compared with the unvaccinated and partially vaccinated individuals, a relatively low risk of secondary attack was found for the individuals who received booster vaccination (aOR: 0.871; 95% CI: 0.761, 0.997). Moreover, a high transmission risk was found for the index cases aged ≥60 years (aOR: 1.359; 95% CI: 1.132, 1.632), whereas a relatively low transmission risk was observed for the index cases who received full vaccination (aOR: 0.642; 95% CI: 0.490, 0.841) and booster vaccination (aOR: 0.676; 95% CI: 0.594, 0.770). Compared with full vaccination, booster vaccination of inactivated COVID-19 vaccine showed an effectiveness of 24.0% (95% CI: 7.0%, 37.9%) against BA.2 transmission for the adults ≥18 years and 93.7% (95% CI: 72.4%, 98.6%) for the adults ≥60 years, whereas the effectiveness was 51.0% (95% CI: 21.9%, 69.3%) for the individuals of 14 days to 179 days after booster vaccination and 51.2% (95% CI: 37.5%, 61.9%) for the non-household contacts. The estimated mean values of the generation interval, serial interval, incubation period, latent period, and viral shedding period were 2.7 days, 3.2 days, 2.4 days, 2.1 days, and 17.9 days, respectively. In summary, our results confirmed that the main transmission route of Omicron BA.2 subvariant was household contact, and booster vaccination of the inactivated vaccines was relatively effective against BA.2 subvariant transmission in older people.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2AdultAgedAged, 80 and overChinaCOVID-19 VaccinesFemaleHumansRetrospective StudiesVaccine EfficacyCOVID-19 VaccinesBA.2 subvariantCOVID-19effectivenessOmicron (B.1.1.529)transmissionvaccines

Identifiers

PMID38259438
PMCPMC10800792
OpenAlexW4390666873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.