ArticleBiomedical engineering advances2023
An
Article in Biomedical engineering advances, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Damage to the dura mater may occur during intracranial or spinal surgeries, which can result in cerebrospinal fluid leakage and other potentially fatal physiological changes. As a result, biological and synthetic derived scaffolds are typically used to repair dura mater post intracranial or spinal surgeries. The extracellular matrix of xenogeneic dura scaffolds has been shown to exhibit increased cell infiltration and regeneration than synthetic dura materials. In this study, we investigated the biocompatibility of native and decellularized porcine dura by seeding rat fibroblast cells onto the constructs. Cell proliferation, cell viability, and the mechanical properties of these dural grafts were evaluated post-re-seeding on days 3,7 and 14. Live-dead staining and resazurin salts were used to quantify cell viability and cell proliferation, respectively. Micro indentation was conducted to quantify the mechanical integrity of the native and acellular dura graft. The findings indicate that the acellular porcine dura graft creates a beneficial setting for infiltrating rat fibroblast cells. Cell viability, proliferation, and micro indentation results on the acellular grafts are comparable with the native control porcine dura tissue. In conclusion, the porcine scaffold material showed increased cell viability at each time point evaluated. The sustained mechanical response and favorable viability of the cells on the decellularized grafts provide promising insight into the potential use of porcine dura in clinical cranial dura mater graft applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.