ArticleCureus2023
The Impact of Asking Medical Students What They Want to Learn on Student Participation in Lectures.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe General Internal Medicine Acting Internship (GIM AI) at our school is a compulsory, one-month-long experience. Morning report-style case-based discussions were conducted on a weekly basis as part of the acting internship and were poorly attended. We sought to redesign our academic half day didactic curriculum and increase voluntary student attendance by allowing students to actively participate in determining the content of the acting internship academic half day.
interventionPrior to the beginning of the acting internship, students were sent an email survey listing seven inpatient topics to rank on a scale of 1-5 (1=not at all interested, 5=very interested). Based on student feedback, one additional topic was added: antibiotic use for common inpatient diagnoses. Topics that received the highest score were selected for topic-based sessions. A total of 32 teaching sessions were conducted over eight months. Twenty-four of these sessions were topic-based and the remainder were case-based. Student attendance at these sessions was voluntary. KEY
resultsCase-based discussions had the lowest preference ranking (n=94, mean=2.9), while cross-cover-based discussions (n=94, mean=4.3, p=0.001) and antibiotic use (n=52, mean=4.3, p=0.001) received the highest scores. Thirty-four percent (41/120) of possible learners attended case-based discussions, while 78% (281/360) of possible learners attended topic-based sessions (p<0.001). Learners reported a statistically significant improvement in comfort level in recognizing and managing 73% of sub-topics (29 out of 41) covered in topic-based sessions.
conclusionsA learner-centered approach to curriculum design led to robust student engagement in our acting internship academic half day. Fourth-year students prefer specific topic-based teaching sessions over case-based, morning report-style sessions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.