ArticleCureus2023
Evaluating the Efficacy of a Novel Side-Support Surgical Tray Stand for Endoscopic Transnasal Skull Base Surgery: A Prospective Study.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective Endoscopic transnasal skull base surgery is a valuable technique used in the surgical treatment of various skull base pathologies. In such surgeries, the reconstruction of the skull base is crucial for surgical success and minimizing complications. This study presents a new side-support surgical tray designed to improve the exposure of the lateral femoral surgical area during surgery, enhancing surgical efficiency and reducing the risk of surgical complications. The study compared this innovative tray stand with the conventional double-sided support tray stand to evaluate its impact on surgical procedures and complications. Materials and methods The study prospectively analyzed 248 endoscopic transnasal skull base surgeries requiring lateral femoral autologous tissue harvesting. One hundred fifty-eight cases were performed using the side-support surgical tray stand (experimental group), while 90 cases used the conventional double-sided support tray stand (control group). Various parameters were evaluated, including satisfaction scores of surgeons, circulating nurses, instrument nurses, and anesthetists, as well as objective outcomes such as surgical duration and the incidence of complications. Results Surgeons in the experimental group expressed higher satisfaction with the surgical field exposure and the portability of the surgical tray stand compared to the control group. Likewise, circulating nurses in the experimental group reported greater satisfaction with the installation and portability, surpassing that of the control group (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.