Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38259364›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

Intertrochanteric Femoral Fractures: A Comparative Analysis of Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes Between Talon Intramedullary Nail and Intertan Nail.

Hüseyin Kürüm, Hacı Bayram Tosun, Faruk Aydemir, Orhan Ayas, Kübra Orhan, Sefa Key

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Factors influencing mechanical failure following intramedullary nailing of proximal femur fractures: a retrospective cohort study.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.

Hüseyin KürümOrthopaedics and Traumatology Department, Ergani State Hospital, Ministry of Health, Diyarbakir, TUR.
Hacı Bayram TosunOrthopaedics Department, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, TUR.
Faruk AydemirEmergency Department, Elazığ Fethi Sekin Training and Research Hospital, Elazığ, TUR.
Orhan AyasOrthopaedics and Traumatology Department, Elazığ Fethi Sekin Training and Research Hospital, Elazığ, TUR.
Kübra OrhanPhysical Therapy and Rehabilitation Department, İnönü University Turgut Özal Medical Center, Malatya, TUR.
Sefa KeyOrthopedics and Traumatology Department, Firat University Hospital, Firat University, Elazığ, TUR.
Fırat University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Hip fractures in the elderly constitute a significant health concern, and their incidence is on the rise. It has been reported that intertrochanteric femoral fractures comprise a large portion of hip fractures, and they are especially prevalent among women. Over 75% of these types of fractures in the elderly occur as a result of simple falls. Surgical intervention must be performed for these fractures to expedite the healing process in patients. The application of a proximal femoral nail (PFN) is conducted using a minimally invasive technique after the fracture has been reduced using closed techniques. This technique maintains the fracture hematoma while minimizing the occurrence of consequences such as surgical trauma, hemorrhaging, infection, and issues with the wound site. This study aimed to assess the radiologic and functional outcomes among the groups following surgical procedures utilizing two distinct PFNs. Methods Between November 2021 and June 2023, a total of 96 individuals (38 males and 58 females) who underwent surgery for ITF using PFN were included in the study. Our surgical team utilized the Talon™ DistalFix™ PFN system (Orthopedic Designs North America Inc., FL, USA) and the Trigen InterTAN® nail (Smith & Nephew). Results The surgery time (number of scopes) for the Talon PFN was recorded as 25 (25-30), while it was 30 (30-35) in the InterTAN group (p<0.001). No nail protrusion was observed in the InterTAN group, whereas nail protrusion was observed in 12 patients (31.6%) in the Talon PFN group (p<0.001). Nail jamming was observed in two (5.3%) patients in the Talon PFN group, while none was observed in the InterTAN group (p<0.07). Conclusion In ITF fractures, the InterTAN nail is a more reliable implant. The shorter surgery time, reduced radiation exposure, and more minimally invasive nature of the Talon PFN might be preferred for geriatric patient populations with comorbidities where prolonged anesthesia could elevate mortality risks or for fractures of two or three pieces (Evans-Jansen Type 1 and Type 2). However, for more unstable fractures (Evans-Jensen Type 3) and in the active elderly patient group, we recommend the use of the InterTAN nail.

Indexed as

elderly hip fracturesevans jansenintertan pfnintertrochanteric femur fracturestalon pfn

Identifiers

PMID38259364
PMCPMC10801105
OpenAlexW4390057549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.