Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38259339›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2023

Neural correlates of fanhood: the role of fan identity and team brand strength.

Ricardo Cayolla, Rui Biscaia, Roy F Baumeister, Hang-Yee Chan, Isabel C Duarte, Miguel Castelo-Branco

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ricardo CayollaDepartment of Economics and Management, Consumer Neuroscience Lab, REMIT, Portucalense University, Porto, Portugal.
Rui BiscaiaDepartment for Health, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom.
Roy F BaumeisterSchool of Psychology, The University of Queensland, Saint Lucia, QLD, Australia.
Hang-Yee ChanKings College London, London, United Kingdom.
Isabel C DuarteInstitute of Nuclear Sciences Applied to Health, Universidade de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Miguel Castelo-BrancoInstitute of Nuclear Sciences Applied to Health, Universidade de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: We analyzed the importance of fan identity and brand strength on fans' neural reactions to different team-related stimuli. Methods: A total of 53 fMRI scans with fans of two professional sport teams were conducted. Following up on a previous study we focused on the differences between fandom levels as well as the contrast between two team "brand" strength. Neural responses were compared among individuals based on their levels of fan identity. In sum, group comparisons between relatively high and lower identity and between weak and strong teams were made based on the notion that the latter reflects team brand strength (strong brand and weak brand). Results: Findings indicate that brain activity in emotion regulation, memory, and cognitive control circuits is influenced by the relative level of fan identity. Discussion: Higher-level identified fans showed increased reactivity to positive stimuli and the under-recruitment of their cognitive appraisal circuits, suggesting more vulnerability to marketers' messages. The strength of the team brand activates different neural mechanisms. Interestingly, the posterior cingulate showed larger recruitment both for weaker brands and lower fan identification, suggesting that visual memory processes are more active in these cases. Neurally processed content depends on the relative brand's strength, highlighting the importance of brand-focused communications.

Indexed as

brand loveconsumer neurosciencefan identitysport fansteam brands

Identifiers

PMID38259339
PMCPMC10800878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.