Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38259258›Full record

ArticleTranslational animal science2024

Benchmarking current preslaughter management factors, welfare indicators, and meat quality outcomes at commercial fed cattle processing facilities in the United States.

Melissa K Davis, Paxton A Sullivan, Ann M Hess, Mahesh N Nair, Daniel F Mooney, Lily N Edwards-Callaway

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational animal science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Melissa K DavisDepartment of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.
Paxton A SullivanDepartment of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.
Ann M HessDepartment of Statistics, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.
Mahesh N NairDepartment of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.
Daniel F MooneyDepartment of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.
Lily N Edwards-CallawayDepartment of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0737-9899

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Preslaughter management factors and their impacts on cattle welfare and meat quality are well documented in current literature. However, certain management factors related to transportation and lairage are underrepresented. Benchmarking preslaughter management factors that can impact welfare and meat quality outcomes will allow the industry to identify areas for improvement. The objective of the current study was to benchmark preslaughter management factors for a nationwide sample of commercial fed cattle processing facilities. Five processing facilities in the West, Midwest, and Southwest regions of the United States were sampled from March 2021 to July 2022. Data were collected on a total of

Indexed as

bruisingcattlemobilitypreslaughtertransportationwelfare

Identifiers

PMID38259258
PMCPMC10803158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.