Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38258902›Full record

ArticleJCI insight2024

Clinical assays rapidly predict bacterial susceptibility to monoclonal antibody therapy.

Matthew J Slarve, Neven Bowler, Elizabeth Burk, Jun Yan, Ulrike Carlino-MacDonald, Thomas A Russo, Brian M Luna, Brad Spellberg

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCI insight, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Monoclonal Antibodies Targeting Bacterial Infections: A Broad Review of the Field.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Antivirulence drugs against Acinetobacter baumannii: where do they stand?World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Matthew J SlarveDepartment of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Neven BowlerDepartment of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Elizabeth BurkDepartment of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Jun YanDepartment of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Ulrike Carlino-MacDonaldDepartment of Medicine, Veterans Administration Western New York Healthcare System and University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, New York, USA.
Thomas A RussoDepartment of Medicine, Veterans Administration Western New York Healthcare System and University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, New York, USA.
Brian M LunaDepartment of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Brad SpellbergLos Angeles General Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
University of Southern California · USVA Western New York Healthcare System · USLos Angeles Medical Center · US

Funding

MAb Passive Vaccination against Acinetobacter baumanniiR01AI130060 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI BRAD J SPELLBERG · 2017 to 2026
$6.7M
Characterization of Rifabutin Therapy Against Antibiotic-Resistant BacteriaR01AI139052 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI LUNA, BRIAN MICHAEL · 2018 to 2021
$2.4M
Determining the value of PBP 7/8 as an antimicrobial target for XDR-A. baumannniiI01BX004677 · VA · VA WESTERN NEW YORK HEALTHCARE SYSTEM · PI THOMAS A RUSSO · 2020 to 2026
–
BLRD VA I01 BX004677NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI130060NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI139052
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With antimicrobial resistance (AMR) emerging as a major threat to global health, monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) have become a promising means to combat difficult-to-treat AMR infections. Unfortunately, in contrast with standard antimicrobials, for which there are well-validated clinical laboratory methodologies to determine whether an infecting pathogen is susceptible or resistant to a specific antimicrobial drug, no assays have been described that can inform clinical investigators or clinicians regarding the clinical efficacy of a MAb against a specific pathogenic strain. Using Acinetobacter baumannii as a model organism, we established and validated 2 facile clinical susceptibility assays, which used flow cytometry and latex bead agglutination, to determine susceptibility (predicting in vivo efficacy) or resistance (predicting in vivo failure) of 1 newly established and 3 previously described anti-A. baumannii MAbs. These simple assays exhibited impressive sensitivity, specificity, and reproducibility, with clear susceptibility breakpoints that predicted the in vivo outcomes in our preclinical model with excellent fidelity. These MAb susceptibility assays have the potential to enable and facilitate clinical development and deployment of MAbs that generally target the surface of microbes.

Indexed as

Acinetobacter baumanniiAnti-Infective AgentsAntibodies, MonoclonalImmunotherapyReproducibility of ResultsAntibodies, MonoclonalAnti-Infective AgentsBacterial infectionsInfectious disease

Identifiers

PMID38258902
PMCPMC10906227
OpenAlexW4391094568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.