Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38258860›Full record

ArticleSubstance use & addiction journal2024

Differences in Normative Beliefs and Tobacco Product Use by Age Among Adults Who Smoke: Cross-Sectional Analysis of a Nationally Representative Sample.

Dana Rubenstein, Dana M Carroll, Rachel L Denlinger-Apte, Jennifer Cornacchione Ross, F Joseph McClernon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Substance use & addiction journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Dana RubensteinDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4103-9641
Dana M CarrollDivision of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Rachel L Denlinger-ApteDepartment of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Division of Public Health Sciences, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Jennifer Cornacchione RossDepartment of Health Law, Policy and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
F Joseph McClernonDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Duke University · USBoston University · USUniversity of Minnesota · USWake Forest University · US

Funding

NRSA Training CoreTL1TR002555 · NCATS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI EDELMAN, DAVID · 2018 to 2022
$3.7M
NRSA Training CoreTL1TR002551 · NCATS · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI TEYTON, LUC · 2018 to 2022
$1.2M
Laying the Foundation for Personalized Smoking Cessation Treatment in the American Indian PopulationK01MD014795 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI CARROLL, DANA MOWLS · 2020 to 2024
$684k
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR002551NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR002555NIMHD NIH HHS K01 MD014795
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe prevalence of combusted cigarette (CC) smoking among older adults is stagnant, with 0 declines attributable to e-cigarette (EC) use. Given that normative beliefs are associated with quitting and switching to ECs, we assessed cross-sectional associations between age, CC, and EC descriptive and injunctive norms and potential interactions with tobacco use behavior.

methodsData are from people with current, established (≥100 lifetime CCs) CC use (n = 8072) at Wave 5 (2018-2019) of the adult Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study. We used adjusted multivariable logistic regressions to model social norms as a function of age (18-24, 25-34, 35-44, 45-54, 55-64, ≥65 years). We also dichotomized age (≥55 vs 18-54) to investigate interactions between age and social norms on past 12-month CC quit attempts and past-month EC use.

resultsOlder age was positively associated with pro- and anti-CC norms and anti-EC norms. Significant interactive effects revealed that being advised to quit smoking by a healthcare provider was more strongly associated with CC quit attempts among adults ≥55 years (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] [95% CI]: 2.12 [1.66, 2.71]) than adults <55 years (aOR: 1.63 [1.34, 2.00]). Reporting people close to you use ECs was also more strongly associated with EC use among adults ≥55 years (aOR: 4.37 [3.35, 5.69]) than among adults <55 years (aOR: 3.43 [2.89, 4.08]).

conclusionsThis study identified modifiable risk factors for tobacco use that may be particularly beneficial for older adults. Behavioral and communication interventions that target normative beliefs may maximize smoking cessation, or harm reduction when cessation is not possible.

Indexed as

Cigarette SmokingElectronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsTobacco ProductsAgedCross-Sectional StudiesHumansTobacco Usecigarettese-cigarettessmokingtobacco

Identifiers

PMID38258860
PMCPMC13265044
OpenAlexW4390395571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.