Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38258771›Full record

ReviewCurrent gene therapy2024

Precision Genome Editing Techniques in Gene Therapy: Current State and Future Prospects.

Kuldeep Singh, Bharat Bhushan, Sunil Kumar, Supriya Singh, Romulo R Macadangdang, Ekta Pandey, Ajit Kumar Varma, Shivendra Kumar

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current gene therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Molecular subtyping-guided precision therapy for ESCC: biomarker-driven strategies and clinical translation pathways.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Nanocarriers for cutting-edge cancer immunotherapies.Journal of translational medicine · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kuldeep SinghDepartment of Pharmacology, Rajiv Academy for Pharmacy, Mathura, Uttar Pradesh, India.ORCID 0000-0001-8772-8157
Bharat BhushanDepartment of Pharmacology, Institute of Pharmaceutical Research, GLA University, Mathura, Uttar Pradesh, India.ORCID 0000-0002-0691-8408
Sunil KumarDepartment of Pharmacology, P.K. University, Thanra, Karera, Shivpuri, Madhya Pradesh, India.ORCID 0000-0002-4481-7325
Supriya SinghDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Babu Banarasi Das Northern India Institute of Technology, Faizabaad road, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.ORCID 0009-0003-0365-2020
Romulo R MacadangdangDepartment of Nursing, College of Allied Health, National University, Philippines.ORCID 0000-0003-0994-7084
Ekta PandeyDepartment of Chemistry, Bundelkhand Institute of Engineering and Technology, Jhansi, Uttar Pradesh, India.ORCID 0000-0001-7472-7980
Ajit Kumar VarmaDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Rama University, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India.ORCID 0000-0002-0654-0206
Shivendra KumarDepartment of Pharmacology, Rajiv Academy for Pharmacy, Mathura, Uttar Pradesh, India.ORCID 0000-0002-2287-6981

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Precision genome editing is a rapidly evolving field in gene therapy, allowing for the precise modification of genetic material. The CRISPR and Cas systems, particularly the CRISPRCas9 system, have revolutionized genetic research and therapeutic development by enabling precise changes like single-nucleotide substitutions, insertions, and deletions. This technology has the potential to correct disease-causing mutations at their source, allowing for the treatment of various genetic diseases. Programmable nucleases like CRISPR-Cas9, transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs), and zinc finger nucleases (ZFNs) can be used to restore normal gene function, paving the way for novel therapeutic interventions. However, challenges, such as off-target effects, unintended modifications, and ethical concerns surrounding germline editing, require careful consideration and mitigation strategies. Researchers are exploring innovative solutions, such as enhanced nucleases, refined delivery methods, and improved bioinformatics tools for predicting and minimizing off-target effects. The prospects of precision genome editing in gene therapy are promising, with continued research and innovation expected to refine existing techniques and uncover new therapeutic applications.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsGene EditingGenetic TherapyHumansPrecision MedicineTranscription Activator-Like Effector NucleasesZinc Finger NucleasesTranscription Activator-Like Effector NucleasesZinc Finger Nucleasesbase editingCRISPR-Cas9gene therapygenetic disordersPrecision genome editingprime editing.therapeutic interventions

Identifiers

PMID38258771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.