ArticleAnnals of surgery2025
Carotid Revascularization Is Associated With Improved Mood in Patients With Advanced Carotid Disease.
Article in Annals of surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the impact of carotid interventions on the mental well-being of patients with carotid stenosis.
backgroundOngoing research highlights the effect of carotid interventions on neurocognitive function in patients with advanced carotid atherosclerosis. However, data regarding the impact of carotid revascularization on mood are scarce.
methodsA total of 157 patients undergoing carotid revascularization were prospectively recruited. The primary outcome was depressive mood, evaluated preoperatively and at 1-, 6-, and 12-month postintervention using the long form of the geriatric depression scale (GDS-30) questionnaire. Other tests were also used to assess cognition at the respective timepoints. Statistical analyses were performed to assess the postoperative outcomes compared with baseline.
resultsBaseline depression (GDS>9) was observed in 49 (31%) subjects, whereas 108 (69%) patients were not depressed (GDS≤9). The average preoperative GDS score was 15.42 ± 4.40 (14.2-16.7) and 4.28 ±2.9 (3.7-4.8) in the depressed and nondepressed groups, respectively. We observed a significant improvement in GDS scores within the depressed group at 1 month ( P =0.002), 6 months ( P =0.027), and 1 year ( P <0.001) postintervention compared with pre-op, whereas the nondepressed group had similar post-op GDS scores at all timepoints compared with baseline. Significant improvement in measures of executive function was seen in nondepressed patients at all 3 timepoints, whereas depressed patients showed an improvement at 1-year follow-up.
conclusionsOur study highlights improvement in mood among patients with advanced carotid disease who screened positive for depression at baseline. Further studies with larger sample sizes are warranted to investigate the association between depression, carotid disease, and carotid intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.