Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38258282›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2024

Multiple imputation strategies for missing event times in a multi-state model analysis.

Elinor Curnow, Rachael A Hughes, Kate Birnie, Kate Tilling, Michael J Crowther

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elinor CurnowDepartment of Statistics and Clinical Research, NHS Blood and Transplant, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3109-3647
Rachael A HughesDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0766-1410
Kate BirnieDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Kate TillingDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Michael J CrowtherDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_00011/3Medical Research Council MC_UU_00032/02Medical Research Council MC_UU_00032/2Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In clinical studies, multi-state model (MSM) analysis is often used to describe the sequence of events that patients experience, enabling better understanding of disease progression. A complicating factor in many MSM studies is that the exact event times may not be known. Motivated by a real dataset of patients who received stem cell transplants, we considered the setting in which some event times were exactly observed and some were missing. In our setting, there was little information about the time intervals in which the missing event times occurred and missingness depended on the event type, given the analysis model covariates. These additional challenges limited the usefulness of some missing data methods (maximum likelihood, complete case analysis, and inverse probability weighting). We show that multiple imputation (MI) of event times can perform well in this setting. MI is a flexible method that can be used with any complete data analysis model. Through an extensive simulation study, we show that MI by predictive mean matching (PMM), in which sampling is from a set of observed times without reliance on a specific parametric distribution, has little bias when event times are missing at random, conditional on the observed data. Applying PMM separately for each sub-group of patients with a different pathway through the MSM tends to further reduce bias and improve precision. We recommend MI using PMM methods when performing MSM analysis with Markov models and partially observed event times.

Indexed as

Research DesignBiasComputer SimulationData Interpretation, StatisticalHumansProbabilityMarkovmissing datamultiple imputationmulti-state modelpredictive mean matching

Identifiers

PMID38258282
PMCPMC7616776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.