ArticleMicromachines2024
Scaling a Hydraulic Motor for Minimally Invasive Medical Devices.
Article in Micromachines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aligned with the medical device industry's trend of miniaturization, academic and commercial researchers are constantly attempting to reduce device sizes. Many applications require miniature actuators (2 mm range) to perform mechanical work; however, biocompatible micromotors are not readily available. To that end, a hydraulic motor-driven cutting module that aims to combine cutting and drug delivery is presented. The hydraulic motor prototype developed has an outside diameter (OD) of ~4 mm (twice the target size) and a 1 mm drive shaft to attach a cutter. Four different designs were explored and fabricated using additive manufacturing. The benchtop experimental data of the prototypes are presented herein. For the prototype motor with fluid inlet perpendicular to the blades, the average angular velocity was 10,593 RPM at a flowrate of 3.6 mL/s and 42,597 RPM at 10.1 mL/s. This design was numerically modeled using 3D-transient simulations in ANSYS CFX (version 2022 R2) to determine the performance characteristics and the internal resistance of the motor. Simplified mathematical models were also used to compute and compare the peak torque with the simulation estimates. The viability of current design represents a crucial milestone in scaling the hydraulic motor to a 2 mm OD to power a microcutter.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.