Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38258202›Full record

ArticleMicromachines2023

A Nanoporous 3D-Printed Scaffold for Local Antibiotic Delivery.

Pouyan Ahangar, Jialiang Li, Leslie S Nkindi, Zohreh Mohammadrezaee, Megan E Cooke, Paul A Martineau, Michael H Weber, Elie Saade, Nima Nateghi, Derek H Rosenzweig

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Micromachines, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Pouyan AhangarDepartment of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3G 1A4, Canada.
Jialiang LiDepartment of Science, TAV College, Montreal, QC H3W 3E1, Canada.
Leslie S NkindiDepartment of Science, TAV College, Montreal, QC H3W 3E1, Canada.
Zohreh MohammadrezaeeDepartment of Science, TAV College, Montreal, QC H3W 3E1, Canada.
Megan E CookeDepartment of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3G 1A4, Canada.
Paul A MartineauDepartment of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3G 1A4, Canada.
Michael H WeberDepartment of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3G 1A4, Canada.
Elie SaadeDepartment of Science, TAV College, Montreal, QC H3W 3E1, Canada.
Nima NateghiDepartment of Science, TAV College, Montreal, QC H3W 3E1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7454-9440
Derek H RosenzweigDepartment of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3G 1A4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6593-8177

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Limitations of bone defect reconstruction include poor bone healing and osteointegration with acrylic cements, lack of strength with bone putty/paste, and poor osteointegration. Tissue engineering aims to bridge these gaps through the use of bioactive implants. However, there is often a risk of infection and biofilm formation associated with orthopedic implants, which may develop anti-microbial resistance. To promote bone repair while also locally delivering therapeutics, 3D-printed implants serve as a suitable alternative. Soft, nanoporous 3D-printed filaments made from a thermoplastic polyurethane and polyvinyl alcohol blend, LAY-FOMM and LAY-FELT, have shown promise for drug delivery and orthopedic applications. Here, we compare 3D printability and sustained antibiotic release kinetics from two types of commercial 3D-printed porous filaments suitable for bone tissue engineering applications. We found that both LAY-FOMM and LAY-FELT could be consistently printed into scaffolds for drug delivery. Further, the materials could sustainably release Tetracycline over 3 days, independent of material type and infill geometry. The drug-loaded materials did not show any cytotoxicity when cultured with primary human fibroblasts. We conclude that both LAY-FOMM and LAY-FELT 3D-printed scaffolds are suitable devices for local antibiotic delivery applications, and they may have potential applications to prophylactically reduce infections in orthopedic reconstruction surgery.

Indexed as

antibioticsantimicrobial resistancebone defectdrug deliverytissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID38258202
PMCPMC10819679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.