Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38258135›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutics2024

Pharmaceutical Approach to Develop Novel Photosensitizer Nanoformulation: An Example of Design and Characterization Rationale of Chlorophyll α Derivative.

Maria B Sokol, Veronika A Beganovskaya, Mariia R Mollaeva, Nikita G Yabbarov, Margarita V Chirkina, Dmitry V Belykh, Olga M Startseva, Anton E Egorov, Alexey A Kostyukov, Vladimir A Kuzmin and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Maria B SokolN. M. Emanuel Institute of Biochemical Physics of Russian Academy of Sciences, 119334 Moscow, Russia.
Veronika A BeganovskayaN. M. Emanuel Institute of Biochemical Physics of Russian Academy of Sciences, 119334 Moscow, Russia.
Mariia R MollaevaN. M. Emanuel Institute of Biochemical Physics of Russian Academy of Sciences, 119334 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-9999-4652
Nikita G YabbarovN. M. Emanuel Institute of Biochemical Physics of Russian Academy of Sciences, 119334 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-3361-9136
Margarita V ChirkinaN. M. Emanuel Institute of Biochemical Physics of Russian Academy of Sciences, 119334 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-6061-4803
Dmitry V BelykhInstitute of Chemistry, Komi Scientific Center, Ural Division of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 167982 Syktyvkar, Russia.
Olga M StartsevaPitirim Sorokin Syktyvkar State University, 167001 Syktyvkar, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-4411-585X
Anton E EgorovN. M. Emanuel Institute of Biochemical Physics of Russian Academy of Sciences, 119334 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-8259-898X
Alexey A KostyukovN. M. Emanuel Institute of Biochemical Physics of Russian Academy of Sciences, 119334 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-4574-8624
Vladimir A KuzminN. M. Emanuel Institute of Biochemical Physics of Russian Academy of Sciences, 119334 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-6586-3251
Sergei M LomakinN. M. Emanuel Institute of Biochemical Physics of Russian Academy of Sciences, 119334 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-3191-8415
Natalia G ShilkinaN. N. Semenov Federal Research Center for Chemical Physics of Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Alexey V KrivandinN. M. Emanuel Institute of Biochemical Physics of Russian Academy of Sciences, 119334 Moscow, Russia.
Olga V ShatalovaN. M. Emanuel Institute of Biochemical Physics of Russian Academy of Sciences, 119334 Moscow, Russia.
Margarita A GradovaN. N. Semenov Federal Research Center for Chemical Physics of Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-9226-3032
Maxim A AbakumovLaboratory of Biomedical Nanomaterials, National University of Science and Technology (MISIS), 119049 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-2622-9201
Aleksey A NikitinLaboratory of Biomedical Nanomaterials, National University of Science and Technology (MISIS), 119049 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-9183-6713
Varvara P MaksimovaBlokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, 115478 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-0896-2952
Kirill I KirsanovBlokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, 115478 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-8599-6833
Elena D NikolskayaN. M. Emanuel Institute of Biochemical Physics of Russian Academy of Sciences, 119334 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-1931-3117
Institute of Biochemical Physics NM Emanuel · RUSemenov Institute of Chemical Physics · RUNational Medical Research Center of Cardiology · RUNational University of Science and Technology · RUInstitute of Biology of Komi Scientific Centre · RUSyktyvkar State University · RU

Funding

Russian Federation President's scholarship 2022-2023 SP-3848.2022.4
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we described physico-chemical properties of novel nanoformulation of photosensitizer-pyropheophorbide α 17-diethylene glycol ester (XL) (chlorophyll α derivative), revealing insights into antitumor activity and maintaining quality, meeting the pharmaceutical approach of new nanoformulation design. Our formulation, based on poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) nanoparticles, increased XL solubility and selective tumor-targeted accumulation. In our research, we revealed, for the first time, that XL binding to polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) enhances XL photophysical activity, providing the rationale for PVA application as a stabilizer for nanoformulations. Results of FTIR, DSC, and XRD revealed the physical interactions between XL and excipients, including PVA, indicating that the encapsulation maintained XL binding to PVA. The encapsulated XL exhibited higher photophysical activity compared to non-encapsulated substance, which can be attributed to the influence of residual PVA. Gamma-irradiation led to degradation of XL; however, successful sterilization of the samples was achieved through the filtration. Importantly, the encapsulated and sterilized XL retained cytotoxicity against both 2D and 3D tumor cell models, demonstrating the potential of the formulated NP-XL for photodynamic therapy applications, but lacked the ability to reactivate epigenetically silenced genes. These findings provide valuable insights into the design and characterization of PLGA-based nanoparticles for the encapsulation of photosensitizers.

Indexed as

antitumor activitycell deathchlorophyll derivativenanoparticlesphotodynamic therapyphotosensitizerPLGA

Identifiers

PMID38258135
PMCPMC10818748
OpenAlexW4390972572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.