Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38257907›Full record

ArticleMicroorganisms2023

Soil Microbiome in Conditions of Oil Pollution of Subarctic Ecosystems.

Elena N Melekhina, Elena S Belykh, Vladimir A Kanev, Anastasia A Taskaeva, Dmitry V Tarabukin, Aurika N Zinovyeva, Ilya O Velegzhaninov, Elena E Rasova, Olga A Baturina, Marsel R Kabilov and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microorganisms, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Elena N MelekhinaInstitute of Biology, Komi Scientifc Center, Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences (IB FRC Komi SC UB RAS), Kommunisticheskaya 28, 167982 Syktyvkar, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-3738-6520
Elena S BelykhInstitute of Biology, Komi Scientifc Center, Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences (IB FRC Komi SC UB RAS), Kommunisticheskaya 28, 167982 Syktyvkar, Russia.
Vladimir A KanevInstitute of Biology, Komi Scientifc Center, Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences (IB FRC Komi SC UB RAS), Kommunisticheskaya 28, 167982 Syktyvkar, Russia.
Anastasia A TaskaevaInstitute of Biology, Komi Scientifc Center, Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences (IB FRC Komi SC UB RAS), Kommunisticheskaya 28, 167982 Syktyvkar, Russia.
Dmitry V TarabukinInstitute of Biology, Komi Scientifc Center, Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences (IB FRC Komi SC UB RAS), Kommunisticheskaya 28, 167982 Syktyvkar, Russia.
Aurika N ZinovyevaInstitute of Biology, Komi Scientifc Center, Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences (IB FRC Komi SC UB RAS), Kommunisticheskaya 28, 167982 Syktyvkar, Russia.
Ilya O VelegzhaninovInstitute of Biology, Komi Scientifc Center, Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences (IB FRC Komi SC UB RAS), Kommunisticheskaya 28, 167982 Syktyvkar, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-4715-4053
Elena E RasovaInstitute of Biology, Komi Scientifc Center, Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences (IB FRC Komi SC UB RAS), Kommunisticheskaya 28, 167982 Syktyvkar, Russia.
Olga A BaturinaInstitute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (ICBFM SB RAS), Lavrentieva 8, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia.
Marsel R KabilovInstitute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (ICBFM SB RAS), Lavrentieva 8, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-2777-0833
Maria Yu MarkarovaInstitute of Biology, Komi Scientifc Center, Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences (IB FRC Komi SC UB RAS), Kommunisticheskaya 28, 167982 Syktyvkar, Russia.

Funding

The Russian Foundation for Basic Research 18-29-05028 mkThe State Assignment of the Institute of Biology of the Federal Research Center of the Komi Scientific Center of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences Registration No. 122040600025-2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study aimed to investigate the recovery of soil quality and the bacterial and fungal communities following various recultivation methods in areas contaminated with oil. Oil spills are known to have severe impacts on ecosystems; thus, the restoration of contaminated soils has become a significant challenge nowadays. The study was conducted in the forest-tundra zone of the European North-East, where 39 soil samples from five oil-contaminated sites and reference sites were subjected to metagenomic analyses. The contaminated sites were treated with different biopreparations, and the recovery of soil quality and microbial communities were analyzed. The analysis of bacteria and fungi communities was carried out using 16S rDNA and ITS metabarcoding. It was found that 68% of bacterial OTUs and 64% of fungal OTUs were unique to the reference plot and not registered in any of the recultivated plots. However, the species diversity of recultivated sites was similar, with 50-80% of bacterial OTUs and 44-60% of fungal OTUs being common to all sites. New data obtained through soil metabarcoding confirm our earlier conclusions about the effectiveness of using biopreparations with indigenous oil-oxidizing micro-organisms also with mineral fertilizers, and herbaceous plant seeds for soil remediation. It is possible that the characteristics of microbial communities will be informative in the bioindication of soils reclaimed after oil pollution.

Indexed as

bioremediationEuropean North-Eastmetagenomic analysisoil pollutionsoilsstagnic cambisols

Identifiers

PMID38257907
PMCPMC10820038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.