Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38257874›Full record

ArticleMicroorganisms2023

Comparative Rumen Metagenome and CAZyme Profiles in Cattle and Buffaloes: Implications for Methane Yield and Rumen Fermentation on a Common Diet.

Pradeep K Malik, Shraddha Trivedi, Atul P Kolte, Archit Mohapatra, Siddharth Biswas, Ashwin V K Bhattar, Raghavendra Bhatta, Habibar Rahman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microorganisms, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Prebiotics and probiotics in animal nutrition: implications for food safety, sustainability, and circular production systems.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Effect of Two Selected Levels ofMicroorganisms · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pradeep K MalikICAR-National Institute of Animal Nutrition and Physiology, Bangalore 560030, India.
Shraddha TrivediInternational Livestock Research Institute, South Asia Regional Office, New Delhi 110012, India.
Atul P KolteICAR-National Institute of Animal Nutrition and Physiology, Bangalore 560030, India.ORCID 0000-0002-3243-4140
Archit MohapatraICAR-National Institute of Animal Nutrition and Physiology, Bangalore 560030, India.
Siddharth BiswasICAR-National Institute of Animal Nutrition and Physiology, Bangalore 560030, India.
Ashwin V K BhattarICAR-National Institute of Animal Nutrition and Physiology, Bangalore 560030, India.
Raghavendra BhattaICAR-National Institute of Animal Nutrition and Physiology, Bangalore 560030, India.
Habibar RahmanInternational Livestock Research Institute, South Asia Regional Office, New Delhi 110012, India.
National Institute of Animal Nutrition and Physiology · IN

Funding

International Livestock Research Institute DARE Window III
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A study was undertaken to compare the rumen microbial community composition, methane yield, rumen fermentation, and CAZyme profiles between cattle and buffaloes. The primary aim of this study was to ascertain the impact of the host species on the above when diet and environmental factors are fixed. A total of 43 phyla, 200 orders, 458 families, and 1722 microbial genera were identified in the study.

Indexed as

buffaloescattledietmetagenomemethane yieldrumen

Identifiers

PMID38257874
PMCPMC10818812
OpenAlexW4390273059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.