Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38257860›Full record

ArticleMicroorganisms2023

Assessment of Potential Anti-Methanogenic and Antimicrobial Activity of Ethyl Nitroacetate, α-Lipoic Acid, Taurine and L-Cysteinesulfinic Acid In Vitro.

Gizem Levent, Aleksandar Božić, Branko T Petrujkić, Todd R Callaway, Toni L Poole, Tawni L Crippen, Roger B Harvey, Pedro Ochoa-García, Agustin Corral-Luna, Kathleen M Yeater and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microorganisms, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Gizem LeventSchool of Veterinary Medicine, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9207-9999
Aleksandar BožićFaculty of Agriculture, Department of Animal Science, University of Novi Sad, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia.
Branko T PetrujkićDepartment of Nutrition and Botany, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Belgrade, 110000 Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID 0000-0002-3112-4589
Todd R CallawayDepartment of Animal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30609, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3310-4979
Toni L PooleUnited States Department of Agriculture/Agricultural Research Service, Southern Plains Agricultural Research Center, College Station, TX 77845, USA.
Tawni L CrippenUnited States Department of Agriculture/Agricultural Research Service, Southern Plains Agricultural Research Center, College Station, TX 77845, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5129-2371
Roger B HarveyUnited States Department of Agriculture/Agricultural Research Service, Southern Plains Agricultural Research Center, College Station, TX 77845, USA.
Pedro Ochoa-GarcíaFacultad de Zootecnia y Ecología, Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua, Chihuahua 31000, Mexico.
Agustin Corral-LunaFacultad de Zootecnia y Ecología, Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua, Chihuahua 31000, Mexico.
Kathleen M YeaterUnited States Department of Agriculture/Agricultural Research Service, Office of the Area Director, 104 Ambrose Hill, Williamsburg, VA 20250, USA.
Robin C AndersonUnited States Department of Agriculture/Agricultural Research Service, Southern Plains Agricultural Research Center, College Station, TX 77845, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2683-4700
Agricultural Research Service · USAutonomous University of Chihuahua · MXTexas Tech University · USUniversity of Belgrade · RSUniversity of Georgia · USUniversity of Novi Sad · RS

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Livestock producers need new technologies to maintain the optimal health and well-being of their animals while minimizing the risks of propagating and disseminating pathogenic and antimicrobial-resistant bacteria to humans or other animals. Where possible, these interventions should contribute to the efficiency and profitability of animal production to avoid passing costs on to consumers. In this study, we examined the potential of nitroethane, 3-nitro-1-propionate, ethyl nitroacetate, taurine and L-cysteinesulfinic acid to modulate rumen methane production, a digestive inefficiency that results in the loss of up to 12% of the host's dietary energy intake and a major contributor of methane as a greenhouse gas to the atmosphere. The potential for these compounds to inhibit the foodborne pathogens,

Indexed as

Escherichia coliethyl nitroacetaterumen methane inhibitorsSalmonellaα-lipoic acid

Identifiers

PMID38257860
PMCPMC10819541
OpenAlexW4390176077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.