Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38257836›Full record

ArticleViruses2024

Passive Surveillance as a Key Tool for African Swine Fever Eradication in Wild Boar: A Protocol to Find Carcasses Tested and Validated in the Mediterranean Island of Sardinia.

Elisabetta Coradduzza, Federica Loi, Francesca Porcu, Daniela Mandas, Fabio Secci, Marco Efisio Pisanu, Cinzia Pasini, Carlo Zuddas, Marcella Cherchi, Daniele Denurra and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Viruses, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. African Swine Fever: A One Health Perspective and Global Challenges.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Elisabetta CoradduzzaIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Sardegna, 07100 Sassari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6942-3296
Federica LoiOsservatorio Epidemiologico Veterinario Regionale, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Sardegna, 09125 Cagliari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3045-3150
Francesca PorcuOsservatorio Epidemiologico Veterinario Regionale, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Sardegna, 09125 Cagliari, Italy.
Daniela MandasOsservatorio Epidemiologico Veterinario Regionale, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Sardegna, 09125 Cagliari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4724-3101
Fabio SecciLocal Sanitary Agency of Sulcis Iglesiente, 09013 Carbonia, Italy.
Marco Efisio PisanuAssociazione CPT-Caccia Pesca e Tradizioni Sardegna, 09094 Marrubiu, Italy.
Cinzia PasiniOsservatorio Epidemiologico Veterinario Regionale, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Sardegna, 09125 Cagliari, Italy.
Carlo ZuddasOsservatorio Epidemiologico Veterinario Regionale, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Sardegna, 09125 Cagliari, Italy.
Marcella CherchiIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Sardegna, 07100 Sassari, Italy.
Daniele DenurraIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Sardegna, 07100 Sassari, Italy.
Ennio BandinoIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Sardegna, 07100 Sassari, Italy.
Antonio PintoreIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Sardegna, 07100 Sassari, Italy.
Vittorio GubertiInstitute for Environmental Protection and Research (ISPRA), 00144 Roma, Italy.
Stefano CappaiOsservatorio Epidemiologico Veterinario Regionale, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Sardegna, 09125 Cagliari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1481-1747
Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Sardegna · ITAgenzia Regionale per la Protezione Ambientale del Piemonte · ITATS Sardegna (Italy) · ITIstituto Superiore per la Protezione e la Ricerca Ambientale · IT

Funding

Ministero della Salute IZS SA RC01/20
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

African swine fever (ASF) is one of the most important and serious contagious hemorrhagic viral diseases affecting domestic pigs and wild boar and is associated with high mortality rates while also having an extensive sanitary and socioeconomic impact on the international trade of animal and swine products. The early detection of the disease is often hampered by inadequate surveillance. Among the surveillance strategies used, passive surveillance of wild boars is considered the most effective method for controlling the African swine fever virus (ASFV). Otherwise, the design of a sufficiently sensitive ASF surveillance system requires a solid understanding of the epidemiology related to the local eco-social context, especially in the absence of virus detection. Even if the number of carcasses needed to demonstrate ASF eradication has been established, the scientific context lacks detail compared to protocols applied in the active search for wild boar carcasses. The aim of this study was to describe the protocol applied in the active search for carcasses, providing detailed information on the number of people and dogs as well as the amount of time and space used within the Mediterranean area. Using a specific tool developed to record, trace, and share field data (the

Indexed as

African Swine FeverAfrican Swine Fever VirusAnimalsCommerceDogsHumansInternationalityItalyMediterranean IslandsSus scrofaSwineAfrican swine fevercarcasseseradicationfreedom from animal diseasemobile apppassive surveillancewild boar

Identifiers

PMID38257836
PMCPMC10820949
OpenAlexW4390973247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.