ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
On the Evaluation of Diverse Vision Systems towards Detecting Human Pose in Collaborative Robot Applications.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- ROEP: A Robotics-Oriented Evaluation Protocol for Deployment-Facing Vision-Language-Action Manipulation Policies.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The State of the Art and Potentialities of UAV-Based 3D Measurement Solutions in the Monitoring and Fault Diagnosis of Quasi-Brittle Structures.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Squat Kinematics Analysis Using Vicon and Affordable Motion-Capture Solutions.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Commercial vision sensors and AI-based pose estimation frameworks for markerless motion analysis in sports and exercises: a mini review.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Tracking human operators working in the vicinity of collaborative robots can improve the design of safety architecture, ergonomics, and the execution of assembly tasks in a human-robot collaboration scenario. Three commercial spatial computation kits were used along with their Software Development Kits that provide various real-time functionalities to track human poses. The paper explored the possibility of combining the capabilities of different hardware systems and software frameworks that may lead to better performance and accuracy in detecting the human pose in collaborative robotic applications. This study assessed their performance in two different human poses at six depth levels, comparing the raw data and noise-reducing filtered data. In addition, a laser measurement device was employed as a ground truth indicator, together with the average Root Mean Square Error as an error metric. The obtained results were analysed and compared in terms of positional accuracy and repeatability, indicating the dependence of the sensors' performance on the tracking distance. A Kalman-based filter was applied to fuse the human skeleton data and then to reconstruct the operator's poses considering their performance in different distance zones. The results indicated that at a distance less than 3 m, Microsoft Azure Kinect demonstrated better tracking performance, followed by Intel RealSense D455 and Stereolabs ZED2, while at ranges higher than 3 m, ZED2 had superior tracking performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.